ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2020
Retraction.
Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retraction.British journal of pharmacology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction of
Authors and funding
0 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retraction: Spagnuolo, R., Recalcati, S., Tacchini, L., and Cairo, G. (2011), Role of hypoxia-inducible factors in the dexrazoxane-mediated protection of cardiomyocytes from doxorubicin-induced toxicity. British Journal of Pharmacology, 163: 299-312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01208.x The above article, published online on January 14, 2011, in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com), has been retracted by agreement between the authors, the journal's Editor-in-Chief, Professor Amrita Ahluwalia, the British Pharmacological Society, and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The retraction has been agreed due to the duplication of Figures 1A and 3A, which overlap with figures appearing in another article published by the authors in the Journal of Leukocyte Biology in 2008. The authors state that due to the time elapsed, they are unable to provide evidence of the original data.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.