ReviewNeuroscience2020
Corticospinal Pathways and Interactions Underpinning Dexterous Forelimb Movement of the Rodent.
Review in Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Harnessing Spinal Cord Stimulation and Neuromodulation for Functional Restoration: From Pain Management to Motor Recovery.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Absence of cortical reorganization following an internal capsule stroke in rodents.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Neurons Are Not All the Same: Diversity in Neuronal Populations and Their Intrinsic Responses to Spinal Cord Injury.ASN neuro · 2025Review
- Dynamic lateralization in contralateral-projecting corticospinal neurons during motor learning.iScience · 2024Article
- A dystonia mouse model with motor and sequencing deficits paralleling human disease.Behavioural brain research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In 2013, Thomas Jessell published a paper with Andrew Miri and Eiman Azim that took on the task of examining corticospinal neuron function during movement (Miri et al., 2013). They took the view that a combination of approaches would be able to shed light on corticospinal function, and that this function must be considered in the context of corticospinal connectivity with spinal circuits. In this review, we will highlight recent developments in this area, along with new information regarding inputs and cross-connectivity of the corticospinal circuit with other circuits across the rodent central nervous system. The genetic and viral manipulations available in these animals have led to new insights into descending circuit interaction and function. As species differences exist in the circuitry profile that contributes to dexterous forelimb movements (Lemon, 2008; Yoshida and Isa, 2018), highlighting important advances in one model could help to compare and contrast with what is known about other models. We will focus on the circuitry underpinning dexterous forelimb movements, including some recent developments from systems besides the corticospinal tract, to build a more holistic understanding of sensorimotor circuits and their control of voluntary movement. The rodent corticospinal system is thus a central point of reference in this review, but not the only focus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.