Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32512110›Full record

ArticleUrology2020

Perceived Impact of Urologic Surgery Training Program Modifications due to COVID-19 in the United States.

Katherine E Fero, James M Weinberger, Steven Lerman, Jonathan Bergman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The role of simulation in training breast surgeons: a systematic review.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Changing Teaching Trends During Covid-19 And Its Impact On Ent Residency Program In India: A Cross Sectional Study.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on surgical residency: Residents' perception.Journal of education and health promotion · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katherine E FeroDepartment of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, CA. Electronic address: kfero@mednet.ucla.edu.
James M WeinbergerDepartment of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
Steven LermanDepartment of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
Jonathan BergmanDepartment of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, CA; Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Los Angeles, CA; VA Greater Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess urology residency program modifications in the context of COVID-19, and perceptions of the impact on urology trainees.

methodsA cross-sectional survey of program leadership and residents at accredited US urology residencies was administered between April 28, 2020 to March 11, 2020. Total cohort responses are reported, and subanalyses were preformed comparing responses between those in in high vs low COVID-19 geographic regions, and between program leaders vs residents.

resultsProgram leaders from 43% of programs and residents from 18% of programs responded. Respondents reported decreased surgical volume (83%-100% varying by subspecialty), increased use of telehealth (99%), a transition to virtual educational platforms (95%) and decreased size of inpatient resident teams (90%). Most residents are participating in care of COVID-19 patients (83%) and 20% endorsed that urology residents have been re-deployed. Seventy nine percent of respondents perceive a negative impact of recent events on urology surgery training and anxiety regarding competency upon completion of residency training was more pronounced among respondents in high COVID-19 regions.

conclusionMajor modifications to urology training programs were implemented in response to COVID-19. Attention must be paid to the downstream effects of the training disruption on urology residents.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesHumansInternship and ResidencyPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2TeachingUnited StatesUrology

Identifiers

PMID32512110
PMCPMC7274971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.