Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32511889›Full record

Observational studyJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2020

Nocturnal hypertension in primary care patients with high office blood pressure: A regional study of the MAPAGE project.

Claire Zabawa, Clément Charra, Anne Waldner, Gilles Morel, Marianne Zeller, Adrien Guilloteau, Katia Mazalovic

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Claire ZabawaDepartment of general medicine, UFR Sciences de Santé, Bourgogne Franche-Comté University, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0450-8752
Clément CharraDepartment of general medicine, UFR Sciences de Santé, Bourgogne Franche-Comté University, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0352-6684
Anne WaldnerDepartment of general medicine, UFR Sciences de Santé, Bourgogne Franche-Comté University, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9831-853X
Gilles MorelDepartment of general medicine, UFR Sciences de Santé, Bourgogne Franche-Comté University, Dijon, France.
Marianne ZellerEA 7460 Cerebro-Cardiovascular Physiopathology and Epidemiology (PEC2), UFR Sciences de Santé, Bourgogne Franche-Comté University, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5763-4579
Adrien GuilloteauINSERM, U1231, Epidemiology and Clinical Research in Digestive Oncology, Dijon, France; UMR1231, EPICAD team, Bourgogne Franche-Comté University, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1161-297X
Katia MazalovicDepartment of general medicine, UFR Sciences de Santé, Bourgogne Franche-Comté University, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9068-858X
Inserm · FRUniversité Bourgogne Franche-Comté · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nocturnal hypertension (NH) is an independent cardiovascular risk factor. We aimed to describe the frequency of NH among primary care hypertensive patients and to analyze NH determinants. This observational, cross-sectional, multicenter study enrolled the patients of 23 general practitioners in Burgundy region, France. We included the first patient of the day with office blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mm Hg, whatever the reason for consultation. All included patients had 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Nocturnal hypertension was considered nighttime mean blood pressure ≥ 120/70 mm Hg, as per current guidelines. Medical, sociodemographic, and deprivation data were collected. Nocturnal hypertensive and non-hypertensive patients were compared. The determinants of NH were identified using logistic regression models. From July 2015 to November 2018, 447 patients were analyzed. Mean office blood pressure was 158.6/91.5 mm Hg, and 255 patients (57.0%) were taking at least one antihypertensive drug. Among the 409 (91.5%) valid ABPM, 316 (77.3%) showed NH. In multivariate analyses, male sex (odds ratio [OR] = 2.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-3.75), first office diastolic blood pressure >100 mm Hg (OR = 5.71, 95% CI 1.53-21.40), and current smoking (OR = 5.91, 95% CI 2.11-16.56) were independent predictors of NH. Obesity was associated with a reduced risk of NH (OR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.25-0.75). No association was found between deprivation status or sociodemographic factors and NH. To conclude, NH was identified in more than three out of four patients with high office blood pressure. Male smokers with high diastolic blood pressure were most affected by NH. ABPM may improve hypertension management in these patients.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHypertensionAgedAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCircadian RhythmCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareAntihypertensive Agents| ambulatory blood pressure monitoringhigh office blood pressurenocturnal hypertensionprimary health care

Identifiers

PMID32511889
PMCPMC8030096
OpenAlexW3033987844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.