Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32511715›Full record

SynthesisBlood advances2020

Diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis of the upper extremity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of test accuracy.

Payal Patel, Cody Braun, Parth Patel, Meha Bhatt, Housne Begum, Wojtek Wiercioch, Jamie Varghese, David Wooldridge, Hani J Alturkmani, Merrill Thomas and 18 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Blood advances, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes of Upper Extremity Deep-Vein Thrombosis in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Payal PatelDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Cody BraunDepartment of Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL.
Parth PatelDepartment of Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MS.
Meha BhattDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Housne BegumDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Wojtek WierciochDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Jamie VargheseDepartment of Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MS.
David WooldridgeDepartment of Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MS.
Hani J AlturkmaniDepartment of Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MS.
Merrill ThomasDepartment of Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MS.
Mariam BaigDepartment of Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MS.
Waled BahajDepartment of Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MS.
Rasha KhatibAdvocate Research Institute, Advocate Health Care, Oak Lawn, IL.
Rohan KeharDivision of Hematology, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Rakesh PonnapureddyDepartment of Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MS.
Anchal SethiDepartment of Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MS.
Ahmad MustafaDepartment of Medicine, University of Missouri, Kansas City, MS.
Wendy LimDepartment of Medicine and.
Grégoire Le GalDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Shannon M BatesDepartment of Medicine and.
Eddy LangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Marc RighiniDivision of Angiology and Hemostasis, Department of Medical Specialties, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nedaa M HusainatDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS; and.
Mohamad A KalotDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS; and.
Yazan Nayif Al JabiriThe Specialty Hospital Jaber Ibn Hayyan St. Shmeisani, Amman, Jordan.
Robby NieuwlaatDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Holger J SchünemannDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Reem A MustafaDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) accounts for ≤10% of DVT and can be associated with morbidity and mortality. Accurate diagnosis and treatment are necessary for safe and effective patient management. We systematically reviewed the accuracy of D-dimer and duplex ultrasonography (US) for the evaluation of suspected first-episode UEDVT. We searched the Cochrane Central Register, OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed for eligible studies, reference lists of relevant reviews, registered trials, and relevant conference proceedings. We included prospective cross-sectional and cohort studies that evaluated test accuracy. Two investigators independently screened and collected data. The risk of bias was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 and certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. We pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity. The review included 9 studies. The pooled estimates for D-dimer sensitivity and specificity were 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.99) and 0.47 (95% CI, 0.43-0.52), respectively. The pooled estimates for duplex US sensitivity and specificity were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.73-0.94) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.72-0.93), respectively. Certainty of evidence was moderate. In this review, we summarized the test accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of D-dimer and duplex US for this indication. The sensitivity and specificity of the tests found in the present review should be considered in the context of whether they are used alone or in combination, which is dependent on the prevalence of disease in the population, the clinical setting in which the patient is being evaluated, cost, potential harms, and patient outcomes. This study was registered at PROSPERO as Systematic Review Registration Number CRD42018098488.

Indexed as

Venous ThrombosisCross-Sectional StudiesHumansProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityUpper Extremity

Identifiers

PMID32511715
PMCPMC7284086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.