Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32511712›Full record

ArticleTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene2020

Catastrophic costs due to tuberculosis worsen treatment outcomes: a prospective cohort study in Indonesia.

Ahmad Fuady, Tanja A J Houweling, Muchtaruddin Mansyur, Erlina Burhan, Jan Hendrik Richardus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. COVID-19 and Tuberculosis-Related Catastrophic Costs.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ahmad FuadyDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Tanja A J HouwelingDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Muchtaruddin MansyurDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jl Pegangsaan Timur No. 16 Jakarta 10310, Indonesia.
Erlina BurhanDepartment of Respiratory and Pulmonology, Persahabatan Hospital - Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jl Persahabatan No. 1 Jakarta 13230, Indonesia.
Jan Hendrik RichardusDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, 3000CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile the incidence of catastrophic costs due to tuberculosis (TB) remains high, there is little evidence about their impact on TB treatment outcomes and adherence. We assessed their effect on treatment outcomes and adherence in Indonesia.

methodsWe interviewed 282 adult TB patients who underwent TB treatment in urban, suburban and rural districts of Indonesia. One year after the interview, we followed up treatment adherence and outcomes. We applied multivariable analysis using generalized linear mixed models.

resultsFollow-up was complete for 252/282 patients. Eighteen (7%) patients had unsuccessful treatment and 40 (16%) had poor adherence. At a threshold of 30% of annual household income, catastrophic costs negatively impacted treatment outcomes (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.15 [95% confidence interval {CI} 1.15 to 15.01]). At other thresholds, the associations showed a similar pattern but were not statistically significant. The association between catastrophic costs and treatment adherence is complex because of reverse causation. After adjustment, catastrophic costs negatively affected treatment adherence at the 10% and 15% thresholds (aOR 2.11 [95% CI 0.97 to 4.59], p = 0.059 and aOR 2.06 [95% CI 0.95 to 4.46], p = 0.07). There was no evidence of such an effect at other thresholds.

conclusionsCatastrophic costs negatively affect TB treatment outcomes and treatment adherence. To eliminate TB, it is essential to mitigate catastrophic costs.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsTuberculosisAdultHumansIncidenceIndonesiaProspective Studiescatastrophic costsIndonesiatreatment adherencetreatment outcomestuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID32511712
PMCPMC7456597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.