Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32511271›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Comparative effectiveness of 4 natural and chemical activators of Nrf2 on inflammation, oxidative stress, macrophage polarization, and bactericidal activity in an in vitro macrophage infection model.

Malika Ali, Marcel Bonay, Valentin Vanhee, Stéphane Vinit, Therese B Deramaudt

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mechanistic review of sulforaphane as a chemoprotective agent in bladder cancer.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Malika AliUVSQ, INSERM END-ICAP, Université Paris-Saclay, Versailles, France.
Marcel BonayUVSQ, INSERM END-ICAP, Université Paris-Saclay, Versailles, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1446-7456
Valentin VanheeUVSQ, INSERM END-ICAP, Université Paris-Saclay, Versailles, France.
Stéphane VinitUVSQ, INSERM END-ICAP, Université Paris-Saclay, Versailles, France.
Therese B DeramaudtUVSQ, INSERM END-ICAP, Université Paris-Saclay, Versailles, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0997-1367
Inserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammation plays a crucial role in the defense response of the innate immune system against pathogen infection. In this study, we selected 4 compounds for their potential or proven anti-inflammatory and/or anti-microbial properties to test on our in vitro model of bacteria-infected THP-1-derived macrophages. We first compared the capacity of sulforaphane (SFN), wogonin (WG), oltipraz (OTZ), and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) to induce the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), a key regulator of the antioxidant, anti-inflammatory response pathways. Next, we performed a comparative evaluation of the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory efficacies of the 4 selected compounds. THP-1-derived macrophages and LPS-stimulated macrophages were treated with each compound and expression levels of genes coding for inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α were quantified by RT-qPCR. Moreover, expression levels of genes coding for M1 (IL-23, CCR7, IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) and M2 (PPARγ, MRC1, CCL22, and IL-10) markers were determined in classically-activated M1 macrophages treated with each compound. Finally, the effects of each compound on the intracellular bacterial survival of gram-negative E. coli and gram-positive S. aureus in THP-1-derived macrophages and PBMC-derived macrophages were examined. Our data confirmed the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of SFN, WG, and DMF on LPS-stimulated THP-1-derived macrophages. In addition, SFN or WG treatment of classically-activated THP-1-derived macrophages reduced expression levels of M1 marker genes, while SFN or DMF treatment upregulated the M2 marker gene MRC1. This decrease in expression of M1 marker genes may be correlated with the decrease in intracellular S. aureus load in SFN- or DMF-treated macrophages. Interestingly, an increase in intracellular survival of E. coli in SFN-treated THP-1-derived macrophages that was not observed in PBMC-derived macrophages. Conversely, OTZ exhibited pro-oxidant and proinflammatory properties, and affected intracellular survival of E. coli in THP-1-derived macrophages. Altogether, we provide new potential therapeutic alternatives in treating inflammation and bacterial infection.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory AgentsAntioxidantsDimethyl FumarateEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFlavanonesHumansInflammationIsothiocyanatesLeukocytes, MononuclearMacrophage ActivationMacrophagesNF-E2-Related Factor 2Oxidative StressPyrazinesStaphylococcal InfectionsAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntioxidantsDimethyl FumarateFlavanonesIsothiocyanatesNFE2L2 protein, humanNF-E2-Related Factor 2oltiprazPyrazinessulforaphaneSulfoxidesThionesThiopheneswogonin

Identifiers

PMID32511271
PMCPMC7279588
OpenAlexW3033796847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.