Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32510990›Full record

GuidelineAnnals of internal medicine2020

Screening for Anxiety in Adolescent and Adult Women: A Recommendation From the Women's Preventive Services Initiative.

Kimberly D Gregory, David Chelmow, Heidi D Nelson, Maureen Sayres Van Niel, Jeanne A Conry, Francisco Garcia, Susan M Kendig, Nancy O'Reilly, Amir Qaseem, Diana Ramos and 5 more

Abstract readPractice GuidelineSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Annals of internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Barriers and Facilitators to Screening for Anxiety and Intimate Partner Violence.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2026
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberly D GregoryCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California (K.D.G.).
David ChelmowVirginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, Virginia (D.C.).
Heidi D NelsonOregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (H.D.N.).
Maureen Sayres Van NielCambridge, Massachusetts (M.S.V.).
Jeanne A ConryAmerican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC (J.A.C., N.O., S.S., C.Z.).
Francisco GarciaPima County Health Department, Tucson, Arizona (F.G.).
Susan M KendigNational Association of Nurse Practitioners in Women's Health, Washington, DC (S.M.K.).
Nancy O'ReillyAmerican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC (J.A.C., N.O., S.S., C.Z.).
Amir QaseemAmerican College of Physicians, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (A.Q.).
Diana RamosCalifornia Department of Public Health, Sacramento, California (D.R.).
Alina SalganicoffKaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park, California (A.S.).
Sarah SonAmerican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC (J.A.C., N.O., S.S., C.Z.).
Julie K WoodAmerican Academy of Family Physicians, Leawood, Kansas (J.K.W.).
Christopher ZahnAmerican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC (J.A.C., N.O., S.S., C.Z.).
Women’s Preventive Services Initiative
American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists · USAmerican Academy of Family Physicians · USAmerican Association of Nurse Practitioners · USAmerican College of Physicians · USCalifornia Department of Public Health · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USDimagi (United States) · USKaiser Family Foundation · USOregon Health & Science University · USPima County Health Department · USVirginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

descriptionThe Women's Preventive Services Initiative (WPSI), a national coalition of women's health professional organizations and patient representatives, developed a recommendation on screening for anxiety in adolescent and adult women to improve detection; achieve earlier diagnosis and treatment; and improve health, function, and well-being. The WPSI's recommendations are intended to guide clinical practice and coverage of services for the Health Resources and Services Administration and other stakeholders. The target audience for this recommendation includes all clinicians providing preventive health care to women, particularly in primary care settings. This recommendation applies to women and adolescent girls aged 13 years or older who are not currently diagnosed with anxiety disorders, including pregnant and postpartum women.

methodsThe WPSI developed this recommendation after evaluating results of a systematic review of the effectiveness of screening, accuracy of screening instruments, and benefits and harms of treatments in adolescent girls and adult women. No studies directly evaluated the overall effectiveness or harms of screening for anxiety. Twenty-seven screening instruments and their variations were moderately to highly accurate in identifying anxiety (33 individual studies and 2 systematic reviews; 171 studies total). Symptoms improved and relapse rates decreased with psychological therapies (246 randomized controlled trials [RCTs] in 5 systematic reviews) and with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (126 RCTs in 3 systematic reviews). The WPSI also considered the effect of screening on symptom progression and identification of associated and underlying conditions, as well as implementation factors. RECOMMENDATION: The WPSI recommends screening for anxiety in women and adolescent girls aged 13 years or older who are not currently diagnosed with anxiety disorders, including pregnant and postpartum women. Optimal screening intervals are unknown, and clinical judgment should be used to determine frequency. When screening suggests the presence of anxiety, further evaluation is necessary to establish the diagnosis and determine appropriate treatment and follow-up.

Indexed as

Mass ScreeningAdolescentAdultAnxiety DisordersCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansPregnancyPreventive Health ServicesPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSerotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake InhibitorsSurveys and QuestionnairesWomen's HealthSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSerotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake InhibitorsAdolescentsAnxietyAnxiety disordersForecastingHealth services administration and managementQuality of lifeQuestionnairesReuptake inhibitorsSerotoninSystematic reviews

Identifiers

PMID32510990
OpenAlexW3034143127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.