Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32510790›Full record

SynthesisHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2021

No evidence synthesis about me without me: Involving young people in the conduct and dissemination of a complex evidence synthesis.

Erin Walker, Elizabeth Shaw, Michael Nunns, Darren Moore, Jo Thompson Coon

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. The benefits, challenges, and best practice for patient and public involvement in evidence synthesis: A systematic review and thematic synthesis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Pooled it
  6. Youth engagement in mental health research: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Pooled it
  7. Adapting a codesign process with young people to prioritize outcomes for a systematic review of interventions to prevent self-harm and suicide.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Pooled it
  8. Co-Production within Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  9. No evidence synthesis about me without me: Involving young people in the conduct and dissemination of a complex evidence synthesis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Pooled it
  10. Article
  11. The Many Faces of Engagement: A Scoping Review of Paediatric Patient and Family Engagement in Clinical Care, Education and Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Public Involvement in Complex Theorising: A Co-Produced Logic Model of the Role of Context in Shaping Child Health.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Working with children and young people in research: Supportive practices and pathways to impact.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin WalkerGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children, NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2871-2547
Elizabeth ShawUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6092-5019
Michael NunnsUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Darren MooreGraduate School of Education, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Jo Thompson CoonUniversity of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5161-0234
University of Exeter · GBGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health 14/157/06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe and reflect on the methods and influence of involvement of young people with lived experience within a complex evidence synthesis. STUDY DESIGN AND

settingLinked syntheses of quantitative and qualitative systematic reviews of evidence about interventions to improve the mental health of children and young people (CYP) with long-term physical conditions (LTCs).

methodsInvolvement was led by an experienced patient and public involvement in research lead. Young people with long-term physical conditions and mental health issues were invited to join a study-specific Children and Young People's Advisory Group (CYPAG). The CYPAG met face to face on four occasions during the project with individuals continuing to contribute to dissemination following report submission.

resultsEight young people joined the CYPAG. Their views and experiences informed (a) a systematic review evaluating the effectiveness of interventions intended to improve the mental health of CYP with LTCs, (b) a systematic review exploring the experiences of interventions intended to improve the mental well-being of CYP with LTCs and (c) an overarching synthesis. The CYPAG greatly contributed to the team's understanding and appreciation of the wider context of the research. The young people found the experience of involvement empowering and felt they would use the knowledge they had gained about the research process in the future.

conclusionCreating an environment that enabled meaningful engagement between the research team and the CYPAG had a beneficial influence on the young people themselves, as well as on the review process and the interpretation, presentation and dissemination of findings.

Indexed as

Mental HealthAdolescentChildHumanschildrenengagementevidence synthesisinvolvementlong-term conditionsmental healthsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32510790
PMCPMC8137485
OpenAlexW3034172689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.