Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32510664›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2020

A Phase II Single Arm Pilot Study of the CHK1 Inhibitor Prexasertib (LY2606368) in BRCA Wild-Type, Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Margaret E Gatti-Mays, Fatima H Karzai, Sanaz N Soltani, Alexandra Zimmer, Jeffrey E Green, Min-Jung Lee, Jane B Trepel, Akira Yuno, Stanley Lipkowitz, Jayakumar Nair and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Science translational medicine · 2023
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. The CHK1 inhibitor Prexasertib is effective againstFrontiers in endocrinology · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. DNA damage targeted therapy for advanced breast cancer.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Margaret E Gatti-MaysLaboratory of Tumor Immunology and Biology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8914-2897
Fatima H KarzaiGenitourinary Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Sanaz N SoltaniWomen's Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Alexandra ZimmerWomen's Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Jeffrey E GreenLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Min-Jung LeeDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Jane B TrepelDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Akira YunoDevelopmental Therapeutics Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Stanley LipkowitzWomen's Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Jayakumar NairWomen's Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Ann McCoyWomen's Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Jung-Min LeeWomen's Malignancies Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
National Institutes of Health · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Targeting DNA damage repair and related pathways in HRD-womens cancersZIABC011525 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI LEE, JUNG-MIN · 2013 to 2025
$14.8M
Signal Transduction Events and the Regulation of Cell GrowthZICSC006743 · NCI · DIVISION OF CLINICAL SCIENCES - NCI · PI TREPEL, JANE B · 2009 to 2023
$13.8M
Genomic characterization of breast cancer in high risk subsets of breast cancerZIABC011650 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI LIPKOWITZ, STANLEY · 2015 to 2025
$2.2M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

lessons learnedMonotherapy with prexasertib demonstrated modest activity in BRCA wild-type, recurrent triple-negative breast cancer, highlighting the unmet need for combination treatment strategies. Neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia are common with the use of prexasertib but are manageable with supportive care measures. Prophylactic use of granulocyte colony stimulating factor should be considered to avoid dose reductions or treatment delays. Pharmacodynamic studies showed prexasertib treatment induced DNA damage in peripheral immune cells.

backgroundCell cycle checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) is a major G2/M cell cycle regulator in tumors with p53 dysfunction, such as triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We hypothesized the second-generation CHK1 inhibitor, prexasertib, would yield clinical activity in sporadic TNBC.

methodsThis single arm, phase II trial evaluated prexasertib at 105 mg/m

resultsAll nine patients enrolled were germline BRCA wild-type (BRCAwt) and had at least one prior treatment. One partial response (PR) was observed (ORR of 11.1%). Four patients experienced stable disease. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 86 days (range 17 to 159 days). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events included afebrile neutropenia (n = 8; 88.9%), anemia (n = 3; 33.3%), and thrombocytopenia (n = 1; 11.1%). Pharmacodynamic studies showed prexasertib treatment induced DNA damage in peripheral immune cells and demonstrated a decrease in activated/reinvigorated CD8 T cells; however, the one patient with a PR showed evidence of T-cell recovery.

conclusionPrexasertib monotherapy had modest clinical efficacy in BRCAwt TNBC. Further studies of prexasertib in combination with other agents are needed.

Indexed as

Triple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansPilot ProjectsPyrazinesPyrazolesprexasertibPyrazinesPyrazoles

Identifiers

PMID32510664
PMCPMC7938394
OpenAlexW3034150292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.