ReviewExpert review of medical devices2020
Device profile of the MobiusHD EVBA system for the treatment of resistant hypertension: overview of its mechanism of action, safety and efficacy.
Review in Expert review of medical devices, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interventional Treatment of Arterial Hypertension in The Modern Era: An Updated Review from the Young Investigator Group of the European Society of Hypertension.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026Review
- Sympathetic Nervous System in Heart Failure: Targets for Treatments.Current hypertension reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionEarly promising results of renal nerve denervation awakened interest in developing medical device alternatives for patients with resistant hypertension. The subsequent sham-controlled renal nerve denervation randomized trials were disappointing leading researchers and innovators to explore alternative device and trial designs to address this significant unmet need. We describe the innovation process leading to the first endovascular carotid baroreflex amplification device currently undergoing clinical trials in the United States and Europe. AREAS COVERED: We provide a brief overview of carotid baroreceptor physiology and then couple this knowledge with the fundamental principles of strain pattern changes that led to the proposed innovation. The mechanism of blood pressure reduction via enhancing innate physiologic carotid sinus baroreceptor signaling through changes in pulsatile focal carotid bulb strain is described alongside preclinical testing and early clinical results. EXPERT OPINION: The collective data to date suggest endovascular carotid baroreflex amplification may be an innovative alternative for resistant hypertension patients. However, well-controlled studies will be needed to assess efficacy, safety, durability, and risk: benefit of this permanent intravascular carotid implant. SUBJECT CODES: high blood pressure, hypertension, treatment, physiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.