Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32509977›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction open2020

Self-management strategies to consider to combat endometriosis symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Mathew Leonardi, Andrew W Horne, Katy Vincent, Justin Sinclair, Kerry A Sherman, Donna Ciccia, George Condous, Neil P Johnson, Mike Armour

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05348005 (Study of the Use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Unit in the Management of Endometriosis Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05348005 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Study of the Use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Unit in the Management of Endometriosis Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorMilton S. Hershey Medical CenterRan2022 to 2025Enrolled40ConditionsEndometriosis, Pelvic PainArmsOvira Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Unit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Mathew LeonardiAcute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy, and Advanced Endoscopy Surgery Unit, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5538-6906
Andrew W HorneMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9656-493X
Katy VincentNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9249-2492
Justin SinclairNICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9960-3191
Kerry A ShermanDepartment of Psychology, Centre for Emotional Health, Macquarie University, North Ryde, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7780-6668
Donna CicciaEndometriosis Australia, Sydney South, Australia.
George CondousAcute Gynaecology, Early Pregnancy, and Advanced Endoscopy Surgery Unit, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3858-3080
Neil P JohnsonRobinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Mike ArmourNICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7539-9851
The University of Sydney · AUJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBMacquarie University · AUMRC Centre for Reproductive Health · GBTranslational Research Institute · AUUniversity of Auckland · NZWestern Sydney University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The care of patients with endometriosis has been complicated by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Medical and allied healthcare appointments and surgeries are being temporarily postponed. Mandatory self-isolation has created new obstacles for individuals with endometriosis seeking pain relief and improvement in their quality of life. Anxieties may be heightened by concerns over whether endometriosis may be an underlying condition that could predispose to severe COVID-19 infection and what constitutes an appropriate indication for presentation for urgent treatment in the epidemic. Furthermore, the restrictions imposed due to COVID-19 can impose negative psychological effects, which patients with endometriosis may be more prone to already. In combination with medical therapies, or as an alternative, we encourage patients to consider self-management strategies to combat endometriosis symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic. These self-management strategies are divided into problem-focused and emotion-focused strategies, with the former aiming to change the environment to alleviate pain, and the latter address the psychology of living with endometriosis. We put forward this guidance, which is based on evidence and expert opinion, for healthcare providers to utilize during their consultations with patients via telephone or video. Patients may also independently use this article as an educational resource. The strategies discussed are not exclusively restricted to consideration during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most have been researched before this period of time and all will continue to be a part of the biopsychological approach to endometriosis long after COVID-19 restrictions are lifted.

Indexed as

coronaviruscounselingCOVID-19endometriosislifestyle managementmind-body therapiespelvic painpsychologyself-careself-management

Identifiers

PMID32509977
PMCPMC7263080
OpenAlexW3024786223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.