Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32509975›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2020

A machine learning approach predicts future risk to suicidal ideation from social media data.

Arunima Roy, Katerina Nikolitch, Rachel McGinn, Safiya Jinah, William Klement, Zachary A Kaminsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Artificial Intelligence and Suicide Prevention: A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Investigations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arunima RoyThe Royal's Institute of Mental Health Research, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada.
Katerina NikolitchThe Royal's Institute of Mental Health Research, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2034-0518
Rachel McGinnThe Royal's Institute of Mental Health Research, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada.
Safiya JinahThe Royal's Institute of Mental Health Research, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada.
William KlementDivision of Thoracic Surgery, The Ottawa Research Hospital Research Institute and Ottawa University, Ottawa, ON Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9616-8662
Zachary A KaminskyThe Royal's Institute of Mental Health Research, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7917-1301

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning analysis of social media data represents a promising way to capture longitudinal environmental influences contributing to individual risk for suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Our objective was to generate an algorithm termed "Suicide Artificial Intelligence Prediction Heuristic (SAIPH)" capable of predicting future risk to suicidal thought by analyzing publicly available Twitter data. We trained a series of neural networks on Twitter data queried against suicide associated psychological constructs including burden, stress, loneliness, hopelessness, insomnia, depression, and anxiety. Using 512,526 tweets from

Indexed as

Predictive markersPsychiatric disordersRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID32509975
PMCPMC7250902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.