Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32509943›Full record

ArticleArthroplasty today2020

Spinal Anesthesia Using Chloroprocaine is Safe, Effective, and Facilitates Earlier Discharge in Selected Fast-track Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Carl L Herndon, Roxana Martinez, Nana O Sarpong, Jeffrey A Geller, Roshan P Shah, H John Cooper

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroplasty today, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07239999 (Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Spinal Anesthesia With 1% Chloroprocaine Versus 1% Mepivacaine in Patients Undergoing Outpatient Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07239999 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Spinal Anesthesia With 1% Chloroprocaine Versus 1% Mepivacaine in Patients Undergoing Outpatient Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

TypeinterventionalSponsorNova Scotia Health AuthorityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled170ConditionsRecovery Period, AnesthesiaArmsMepivacaine Injection, Chloroprocaine Injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Ambulatory total hip and knee arthroplasty: a literature review and perioperative considerations.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carl L HerndonColumbia University Irving Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Roxana MartinezColumbia University Irving Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Nana O SarpongColumbia University Irving Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Jeffrey A GellerColumbia University Irving Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Roshan P ShahColumbia University Irving Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
H John CooperColumbia University Irving Medical Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpinal anesthetic choice plays an underappreciated role in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Chloroprocaine, a short-acting local anesthetic, has been limited to short-duration ambulatory procedures and has not been studied in THA. We compare perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing fast-track THA using chloroprocaine spinal anesthesia with those who have surgery with a longer-acting agent (bupivacaine).

methodsA total of 143 THAs performed under spinal anesthesia by 3 arthroplasty surgeons between November 2018 and July 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients receiving chloroprocaine were matched 1:1 by demographics to patients receiving bupivacaine. Ultimately, 74 patients were included (37 chloroprocaine and 37 bupivacaine). The primary outcome was hospital length of stay (LOS). Other perioperative outcomes were also evaluated.

resultsA total of 37 patients (50%) received chloroprocaine (60 mg), whereas 37 (50%) received bupivacaine (median 10 mg, range 8-15 mg). Among the matched groups, chloroprocaine use was associated with shorter hospital LOS (0.9 vs 1.2 days;

conclusionChloroprocaine is a safe and reliable option for patients to mobilize rapidly and leave the hospital sooner after THA. Compared with bupivacaine, it is associated with shorter hospital LOS and higher likelihood for discharge to home.

Indexed as

Length of stayPerioperative outcomesShort-acting spinal anesthesiaTotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID32509943
PMCPMC7264955
OpenAlexW3033954020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.