Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32509861›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2020

Database Mining of Genes of Prognostic Value for the Prostate Adenocarcinoma Microenvironment Using the Cancer Gene Atlas.

Xin Zhao, Daixing Hu, Jia Li, Guozhi Zhao, Wei Tang, Honglin Cheng

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. CCL13 and human diseases.Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Infiltration of LPAR5Frontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xin ZhaoDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1768-7780
Daixing HuDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6175-6694
Jia LiDepartment of Thyroid and Breast, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai 200072, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4066-4795
Guozhi ZhaoDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4477-9891
Wei TangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1953-6828
Honglin ChengDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6839-936X
The Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University · CNTongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate adenocarcinoma (PRAD) is a common malignant tumor in elderly men. Our research uses The Cancer Gene Atlas (TCGA) database to find potential related genes for predicting the prognosis of patients with PRAD.

methodsWe downloaded gene expression profiles and clinical sample information from TCGA for 490 patients with PRAD (patient age: 41-78 years). We calculated stromal and immune scores using the ESTIMATE algorithm to predict the level of stromal and immune cell infiltration. We categorized patients with PRAD in TCGA into high and low score arrays according to their median immune/stromal scores and identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that were significantly correlated with the prognosis of PRAD. Then, Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses were performed. The association between DEGs and overall survival was investigated by weighted Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate analysis. Furthermore, the protein-protein interaction network (PPI) of DEGs was constructed using the STRING tool. Finally, the hub genes were identified by analyzing the degree of association of PPI networks.

resultsWe found that 8 individual DEGs, C6, S100A12, MLC1, PAX5, C7, FAM162B, CAMK1G, and TCEAL5, were significantly predictive of favorable overall survival and one DEG, EPYC, was associated with poor overall survival. GO and KEGG pathway analyses revealed that the DEGs were associated with immune responses. Moreover, 30 hub genes were obtained using the PPI network of DEGs: ITGAM, CD4, CD3E, IL-10, LCP2, ITGB2, ZAP-70, C3, CCL19, CXCL13, CXCL9, BTK, CCL21, CD247, CD28, CD3D, FCER1G, PTPRC, TYROBP, CCR5, ITK, CCL13, CCR1, CCR2, CD79B, CYBB, IL2RG, JAK3, PLCG2, and CD19. These prominent nodes had the most associations with other genes, indicating that they might play crucial roles in the prognosis of PRAD.

conclusionsWe extracted a list of genes associated with the prostate adenocarcinoma microenvironment, which might contribute to the prediction and interpretation of PRAD prognosis.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaGene OntologyProstatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedAlgorithmsComputational BiologyData MiningHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProtein Interaction MapsTranscriptomeTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID32509861
PMCPMC7251429
OpenAlexW3027993870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.