Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32509854›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2020

Comparison of the Microbiota and Inorganic Anion Content in the Saliva of Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Free Individuals.

Elvira E Ziganshina, Ildar I Sagitov, Ramilya F Akhmetova, Gulshat T Saleeva, Andrey P Kiassov, Natalya E Gogoleva, Elena I Shagimardanova, Ayrat M Ziganshin

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Obstructive sleep apnea and primary snoring in children are associated with oropharyngeal dysbiosis and a mild compositional imbalance in the gastrointestinal tract.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Microbiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Human Microbiome-A Physiologic Perspective.Comprehensive Physiology · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Growth Efficiency ofBiotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Growth Characteristics ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. mBio · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elvira E ZiganshinaDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan 420008, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2777-843X
Ildar I SagitovDepartment of Orthopedic Dentistry, Kazan State Medical University, Kazan 420012, Russia.
Ramilya F AkhmetovaDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan 420008, Russia.
Gulshat T SaleevaDepartment of Orthopedic Dentistry, Kazan State Medical University, Kazan 420012, Russia.
Andrey P KiassovDepartment of Morphology and General Pathology, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan 420008, Russia.
Natalya E GogolevaLaboratory of Extreme Biology, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan 420021, Russia.
Elena I ShagimardanovaLaboratory of Extreme Biology, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan 420021, Russia.
Ayrat M ZiganshinDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan 420008, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6296-8955
Kazan Federal University · RUKazan State Medical University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The oral cavity is one of the most complex microbial environments; however, the complex nature of the salivary microbiota and the level of inorganic anions in the saliva of subjects with and without gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are poorly understood. The primary goals of this pilot research were to assess differences in salivary bacterial community composition and inorganic anion concentrations between patients with GERD and GERD-free people. Thus, the salivary microbiota within both groups was dominated by these genera: Streptococcus, Prevotella, Porphyromonas, Veillonella, Neisseria, Haemophilus, Fusobacterium, Rothia, and Leptotrichia. However, the relative abundances of the genera Actinomyces, Atopobium, Stomatobaculum, Ruminococcaceae_[G-2], Veillonella, and Leptotrichia were significantly higher in the saliva samples of patients with GERD, while the genera Porphyromonas, Gemella, Peptostreptococcus, and Neisseria were less abundant in this group. The concentrations of chloride, phosphate, and sulphate ions in the human saliva varied among all subjects and sampling time. These results broaden our knowledge of the salivary microbial community composition and chemistry of saliva of patients with GERD and GERD-free individuals.

Indexed as

Gastroesophageal RefluxSalivaAdultAnionsBacteriaFemaleHumansMaleMicrobiotaPilot ProjectsYoung AdultAnions

Identifiers

PMID32509854
PMCPMC7244971
OpenAlexW3025019213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.