ArticleHepatobiliary surgery and nutrition2020
Can robotic liver resection compensate for weaknesses of the laparoscopic approach?
Article in Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Single-Port Robotic Liver Surgery: A Pilot Feasibility Study of a Standardized Surgical Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Primary Hepatobiliary Tumors-Possibilities and Limitations.Cancers · 2022Review
- Current trends in three-dimensional visualization and real-time navigation as well as robot-assisted technologies in hepatobiliary surgery.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021Review
- [Possibilities and limits of robotic liver surgery - Current status 2020].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021Review
- Case Report: Successful DaVinci-Assisted Major Liver Resection for Alveolar Echinococcosis.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.