Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32509805›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2020

Toward Antibiotic Stewardship: Route of Antibiotic Administration Impacts the Microbiota and Resistance Gene Diversity in Swine Feces.

Nicole Ricker, Julian Trachsel, Phillip Colgan, Jennifer Jones, Jinlyung Choi, Jaejin Lee, Johann F Coetzee, Adina Howe, Susan L Brockmeier, Crystal L Loving and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Microbial genomics · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Antimicrobial Resistance and Clonal Lineages ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole RickerFood Safety and Enteric Pathogens Research Unit, ARS-USDA National Animal Disease Center, Ames, IA, United States.
Julian TrachselFood Safety and Enteric Pathogens Research Unit, ARS-USDA National Animal Disease Center, Ames, IA, United States.
Phillip ColganAgricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Jennifer JonesFood Safety and Enteric Pathogens Research Unit, ARS-USDA National Animal Disease Center, Ames, IA, United States.
Jinlyung ChoiAgricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Jaejin LeeAgricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Johann F CoetzeeCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.
Adina HoweAgricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Susan L BrockmeierVirus and Prion Research Unit, ARS-USDA National Animal Disease Center, Ames, IA, United States.
Crystal L LovingFood Safety and Enteric Pathogens Research Unit, ARS-USDA National Animal Disease Center, Ames, IA, United States.
Heather K AllenFood Safety and Enteric Pathogens Research Unit, ARS-USDA National Animal Disease Center, Ames, IA, United States.
National Animal Disease Center · USIowa State University · USKansas State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral antibiotics are a critical tool for fighting bacterial infections, yet their use can have negative consequences, such as the disturbance of healthy gut bacterial communities and the dissemination of antibiotic residues in feces. Altering antibiotic administration route may limit negative impacts on intestinal microbiota and reduce selective pressure for antimicrobial resistance genes (ARG) persistence and mobility. Thus, a study was performed in pigs to evaluate route of therapeutic oxytetracycline (oxytet) administration, an antibiotic commonly used in the U.S. swine industry, on intestinal microbial diversity and ARG abundance. Given that oral antibiotics would be in direct contact with intestinal bacteria, we hypothesized that oral administration would cause a major shift in intestinal bacterial community structure when compared to injected antibiotic. We further postulated that the impact would extend to the diversity and abundance of ARG in swine feces. At approximately 3 weeks-of-age, piglets were separated into three groups (

Indexed as

antibiotic usagemicrobiomeoxytetracyclineresistanceswine

Identifiers

PMID32509805
PMCPMC7249142
OpenAlexW3028405889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.