Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32509757›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physics2020

Ultrasound neuromodulation: mechanisms and the potential of multimodal stimulation for neuronal function assessment.

Hermes A S Kamimura, Allegra Conti, Nicola Toschi, Elisa E Konofagou

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07518927 (Mapping Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound), which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07518927 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Mapping Low-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (LIFU)-Evoked Brain Network Responses Using Intracranial Electrophysiological Recordings

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2026 to 2031Enrolled30ConditionsLow Intensity Focussed Ultrasound, Electrodes, ImplantedArmsLow Intensity Focused Ultrasound
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. A Wearable Dual-Mode Probe for Image-Guided Closed-Loop Ultrasound Neuromodulation.IEEE transactions on biomedical circuits and systems · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Overview of Therapeutic Ultrasound Applications and Safety Considerations: 2024 Update.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hermes A S KamimuraUltrasound Elasticity Imaging Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New Yor, NY, USA.
Allegra ContiDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Nicola ToschiDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Elisa E KonofagouUltrasound Elasticity Imaging Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New Yor, NY, USA.

Funding

An integrated theranostic system for breast cancerR01CA228275 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KONOFAGOU, ELISA E. · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
Mechanistic Monitoring of Ultrasound NeuromodulationR01EB027576 · NIBIB · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI KONOFAGOU, ELISA E. · 2019 to 2022
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA228275NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Focused ultrasound (FUS) neuromodulation has shown that mechanical waves can interact with cell membranes and mechanosensitive ion channels, causing changes in neuronal activity. However, the thorough understanding of the mechanisms involved in these interactions are hindered by different experimental conditions for a variety of animal scales and models. While the lack of complete understanding of FUS neuromodulation mechanisms does not impede benefiting from the current known advantages and potential of this technique, a precise characterization of its mechanisms of action and their dependence on experimental setup (e.g., tuning acoustic parameters and characterizing safety ranges) has the potential to exponentially improve its efficacy as well as spatial and functional selectivity. This could potentially reach the cell type specificity typical of other, more invasive techniques e.g., opto- and chemogenetics or at least orientation-specific selectivity afforded by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Here, the mechanisms and their potential overlap are reviewed along with discussions on the potential insights into mechanisms that magnetic resonance imaging sequences along with a multimodal stimulation approach involving electrical, magnetic, chemical, light, and mechanical stimuli can provide.

Indexed as

central nervous systemfocused ultrasoundmagnetic resonance imagingperipheral nervous systemtherapeutic ultrasoundultrasound neuromodulation

Identifiers

PMID32509757
PMCPMC7274478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.