ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020
TOOme: A Novel Computational Framework to Infer Cancer Tissue-of-Origin by Integrating Both Gene Mutation and Expression.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
68 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- New techniques to identify the tissue of origin for cancer of unknown primary in the era of precision medicine: progress and challenges.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Pooled it
- RUNX3 Expression Level Is Correlated with the Clinical and Pathological Characteristics in Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.BioMed research international · 2021Pooled it
- Cancer of unknown primary: the evolution of tissue of origin identification in the artificial intelligence era.Biomarker research · 2026Review
- Integrating artificial intelligence into cancers of unknown primary diagnosis and treatment.iScience · 2026Review
- Characterization of telomere-related gene subtypes in lung adenocarcinoma and their implications for prognosis and treatment.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Unraveling heterogeneity in LUAD via multi-omics integration: molecular classification and therapeutic implications.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Bioinformatics combined with machine learning for the identification of malignant transformation markers in colorectal polyps.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
- A multi-task deep learning framework for simultaneous prediction of microsatellite instability and tumor mutational burden in gastric cancer from histopathological images.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- SurvBoard: standardized benchmarking for multi-omics cancer survival models.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- A fusion model to predict the survival of colorectal cancer based on histopathological image and gene mutation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Liquid biopsies in cancer.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Review
- Pan-cancer analysis and experimental verification of cytochrome B561 as a prognostic and therapeutic biomarker in breast cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Article
- Predicting Breast Cancer Relapse from Histopathological Images with Ensemble Machine Learning Models.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024Article
- A Recent Advance in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Vaccine Development for Human Schistosomiasis.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024Review
- Gene-Based Predictive Modelling for Enhanced Detection of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Using CNN-Based DL Algorithm.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Identification of cancer risk groups through multi-omics integration using autoencoder and tensor analysis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Advancing forensic-based investigation incorporating slime mould search for gene selection of high-dimensional genetic data.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Effects of different KRAS mutants and Ki67 expression on diagnosis and prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metastatic cancers require further diagnosis to determine their primary tumor sites. However, the tissue-of-origin for around 5% tumors could not be identified by routine medical diagnosis according to a statistics in the United States. With the development of machine learning techniques and the accumulation of big cancer data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), it is now feasible to predict cancer tissue-of-origin by computational tools. Metastatic tumor inherits characteristics from its tissue-of-origin, and both gene expression profile and somatic mutation have tissue specificity. Thus, we developed a computational framework to infer tumor tissue-of-origin by integrating both gene mutation and expression (TOOme). Specifically, we first perform feature selection on both gene expressions and mutations by a random forest method. The selected features are then used to build up a multi-label classification model to infer cancer tissue-of-origin. We adopt a few popular multiple-label classification methods, which are compared by the 10-fold cross validation process. We applied TOOme to the TCGA data containing 7,008 non-metastatic samples across 20 solid tumors. Seventy four genes by gene expression profile and six genes by gene mutation are selected by the random forest process, which can be divided into two categories: (1) cancer type specific genes and (2) those expressed or mutated in several cancers with different levels of expression or mutation rates. Function analysis indicates that the selected genes are significantly enriched in gland development, urogenital system development, hormone metabolic process, thyroid hormone generation prostate hormone generation and so on. According to the multiple-label classification method, random forest performs the best with a 10-fold cross-validation prediction accuracy of 96%. We also use the 19 metastatic samples from TCGA and 256 cancer samples downloaded from GEO as independent testing data, for which TOOme achieves a prediction accuracy of 89%. The cross-validation validation accuracy is better than those using gene expression (i.e., 95%) and gene mutation (53%) alone. In conclusion, TOOme provides a quick yet accurate alternative to traditional medical methods in inferring cancer tissue-of-origin. In addition, the methods combining somatic mutation and gene expressions outperform those using gene expression or mutation alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.