ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2020
A 10 years retrospective study of assessment of prevalence and risk factors of dental implants failures.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review on removal of osseointegrated implants: un update.BMC oral health · 2023Pooled it
- Systematic review on diabetes mellitus and dental implants: an update.International journal of implant dentistry · 2022Pooled it
- Association ofInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Continuous local minocycline delivery from PLA nanosphere-coated dental implants with long-term antibacterial activity and biocompatibility.RSC advances · 2026Article
- Evaluation of graft osteogenesis using fractal dimension analysis on cone-beam computed tomography images following maxillary sinus lift surgery.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Correlation between marginal bone loss around dental implants and various systemic diseases: a cross-sectional study.International journal of implant dentistry · 2024Article
- The Effects of Smoking on Dental Implant Failure: A Current Literature Update.Dentistry journal · 2024Review
- Do dental implants installed in different types of bone (I, II, III, IV) have different success rates? A systematic review and meta-analysis.The Saudi dental journal · 2024Review
- Hypertension and Dental Implants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Rhamnolipid 89 Biosurfactant Is Effective againstInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- A Retrospective Analysis to Assess the Reasons for the Failure of Dental Implants.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2023Article
- Analyzing the Causes and Frequency of Early Dental Implant Failure among Iranians: An Epidemiological Study.International journal of dentistry · 2023Article
- Systemic Diseases and Biological Dental Implant Complications: A Narrative Review.Dentistry journal · 2022Review
- Bone quality analysis of jaw bones in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus-post mortem anatomical and microstructural evaluation.Clinical oral investigations · 2021Article
- The Crucial Role of Plaque Control in Peri-Implant Mucositis Initiation as Opposed to the Role of Systemic Health Condition: A Cross-Sectional Study.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe present study was conducted to determine the prevalence rate of dental implants failure and risk factors affecting dental implant outcome. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe present retrospective study was conducted on 826 patients who received 1420 dental implants in both genders. Length of implant, diameter of implant, location of implant, and bone quality were recorded. Risk factors such as habit of smoking, history of diabetes, hypertension, etc., were recorded.
resultsIn 516 males, 832 dental implants and in 310 females, 588 dental implants were placed. Maximum dental implant failure was seen with length <10 mm (16%), with diameter <3.75 mm, and with type IV bone (20.6%). The difference found to be significant (
conclusionDental implant failure was high in type IV bone, dental implant with <3.75 mm diameter, dental implant with length <10.0 mm, and among smokers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.