Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32509600›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2020

Targeting Natural Killer Cells for Improved Immunity and Control of the Adaptive Immune Response.

Stephen Pierce, Eric S Geanes, Todd Bradley

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. A standardized combination ofFood & nutrition research · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Immune-enhancement effects ofFood science and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephen PierceCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, United States.
Eric S GeanesCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, United States.
Todd BradleyCenter for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, United States.
Children's Mercy Hospital · USUniversity of Missouri–Kansas City · US

Funding

Natural killer cell regulation of the germinal center HIV neutralizing antibody responseR01AI147778 · NIAID · CHILDREN'S MERCY HOSP (KANSAS CITY, MO) · PI BRADLEY, TODD CHRISTOPHER · 2020 to 2024
$3.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI147778
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural killer (NK) cells are critical for targeting and killing tumor, virus-infected and stressed cells as a member of the innate immune system. Recently, NK cells have also emerged as key regulators of adaptive immunity and have become a prominent therapeutic target for cancer immunotherapy and infection control. NK cells display a diverse array of phenotypes and function. Determining how NK cells develop and are regulated is critical for understanding their role in both innate and adaptive immunity. In this review we discuss current research approaches into NK cell adaptive immunity and how these cells are being harnessed for improving cancer and vaccination outcomes.

Indexed as

Adaptive ImmunityImmunity, InnateNeoplasmsHumansImmunotherapyKiller Cells, Naturaladaptive immune cellsinnate and adaptive immune responsenatural killer (Nk) cellNK cell therapyvaccine

Identifiers

PMID32509600
PMCPMC7248265
OpenAlexW3027268760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.