Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32509577›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020

Clinical Significance of Hotspot Mutation Analysis of Urinary Cell-Free DNA in Urothelial Bladder Cancer.

Yujiro Hayashi, Kazutoshi Fujita, Kyosuke Matsuzaki, Marie-Lisa Eich, Eisuke Tomiyama, Makoto Matsushita, Yoko Koh, Kosuke Nakano, Cong Wang, Yu Ishizuya and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Analytical Validation of the CxbladderDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Urinary Analysis ofThe Journal of urology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Yujiro HayashiDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Kazutoshi FujitaDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Kyosuke MatsuzakiDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Marie-Lisa EichDepartment Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Eisuke TomiyamaDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Makoto MatsushitaDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Yoko KohDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Kosuke NakanoDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Cong WangDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Yu IshizuyaDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Taigo KatoDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Koji HatanoDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Atsunari KawashimaDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Takeshi UjikeDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Motohide UemuraDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Ryoichi ImamuraDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
George J NettoDepartment Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
Norio NonomuraDepartment of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan.
Osaka University · JPUniversity Hospital Cologne · DEUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies showed the clinical utility of next-generation sequencing of urinary cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from patients with urothelial bladder cancer (UBC). In this study, we aimed to develop urinary cfDNA analysis by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) as a high-throughput and rapid assay for UBC detection and prognosis. We analyzed urinary cfDNA of 202 samples from 2 cohorts. Test cohort was designed for investigating clinical utility of urinary cfDNA, and was composed of 74 samples from patients with UBC, and 52 samples of benign hematuria patients. Validation cohort was designed for validation and assessment of clinical utility comparing urinary cfDNA with UroVysion (Abbott, Illinois, USA), and was composed of 40 samples from patients with UBC, and 36 prospectively collected samples from patients under surveillance after surgery for urothelial carcinoma. We performed ddPCR analysis of hotspot gene mutations (

Indexed as

bladder cancercell-free DNAFGFR3liquid biopsyPCRprognosisTERT promoterUroVysion

Identifiers

PMID32509577
PMCPMC7250242
OpenAlexW3027073893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.