Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32509472›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

Insights on early mutational events in SARS-CoV-2 virus reveal founder effects across geographical regions.

Carlos Farkas, Francisco Fuentes-Villalobos, Jose Luis Garrido, Jody Haigh, María Inés Barría

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Advancements in detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection for confronting COVID-19 pandemics.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Carlos FarkasOncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
Francisco Fuentes-VillalobosFaculty of Biological Sciences, Department of Microbiology, Center of Biotechnology, Universidad de Concepción, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.ORCID 0000-0003-3120-0198
Jose Luis GarridoIchor Biologics LLC, New York, NY, USA.
Jody HaighOncology and Hematology, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
María Inés BarríaFaculty of Biological Sciences, Department of Microbiology, Center of Biotechnology, Universidad de Concepción, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
CancerCare Manitoba · CAUniversity of Concepción · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we aim to describe early mutational events across samples from publicly available SARS-CoV-2 sequences from the sequence read archive and GenBank repositories. Up until 27 March 2020, we downloaded 50 illumina datasets, mostly from China, USA (WA State) and Australia (VIC). A total of 30 datasets (60%) contain at least a single founder mutation and most of the variants are missense (over 63%). Five-point mutations with clonal (founder) effect were found in USA next-generation sequencing samples. Sequencing samples from North America in GenBank (22 April 2020) present this signature with up to 39% allele frequencies among samples (

Indexed as

CoronavirusCOVID-19Founder effectMutationsRT-qPCRSARS-CoV-2SNVsViral genetic drift

Identifiers

PMID32509472
PMCPMC7246029
OpenAlexW3027488591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.