ArticleScientifica2020
Implementation of a Framework for Healthy and Diabetic Retinopathy Retinal Image Recognition.
Article in Scientifica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The feature extraction stage remains a major component of every biometric recognition system. In most instances, the eventual accuracy of a recognition system is dependent on the features extracted from the biometric trait and the feature extraction technique adopted. The widely adopted technique employs features extracted from healthy retinal images in training retina recognition system. However, literature has shown that certain eye diseases such as diabetic retinopathy (DR), hypertensive retinopathy, glaucoma, and cataract could alter the recognition accuracy of the retina recognition system. This connotes that a robust retina recognition system should be designed to accommodate healthy and diseased retinal images. A framework with two different approaches for retina image recognition is presented in this study. The first approach employed structural features for healthy retinal image recognition while the second employed vascular and lesion-based features for DR retinal image recognition. Any input retinal image was first examined for the presence of DR symptoms before the appropriate feature extraction technique was adopted. Recognition rates of 100% and 97.23% were achieved for the healthy and DR retinal images, respectively, and a false acceptance rate of 0.0444 and a false rejection rate of 0.0133 were also achieved.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.