ArticleJournal of ophthalmology2020
Reliability of a New Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometer in Healthy Children, Adults, and Cataract Patients.
Article in Journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ocular biometry agreement among ZW-30, IOLMaster 700, and sirius in cataract patients.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Comparison of two swept-source optical biometers in eyes with long axial length.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Evaluation of a new dynamic real-time visualization 25 kHz swept-source optical coherence tomography based biometer.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2024Article
- Biometry-Based Technique for Determining the Anterior Scleral Thickness: Validation Using Optical Coherence Tomography Landmarks.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Agreement of Corneal Diameter and Anterior Chamber Depth Measurements with the IOLMaster 500 and the IOLMaster 700 Optical Biometers in Myopic Eyes.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Article
- Clinical Validation of a New Optical Biometer for Myopia Control in a Healthy Pediatric Population.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Success Rate of Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography Biometry of Eyes of Elementary School Students.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Article
- Comparison of refractive outcomes using Scheimpflug Holladay equivalent keratometry or IOLMaster 700 keratometry for IOL power calculation.International ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Comparison of Barrett and Kane keratoconic formulae in eyes with only posterior corneal changes.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological SocietyArticle
- Comparison of the ocular ultrasonic and optical biometry devices in the different quality measurements.Journal of optometryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo comprehensively assess the reliability of a new optical biometer (IOLMaster 700), based on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and comparison with a standard biometer (IOLMaster 500), in healthy children, adults, and cataract patients.
methodsA total of 301 eyes from 301 consecutive subjects were enrolled prospectively. Two experienced operators measured each eye three times consecutively with the IOLMaster 700. The axial length (AL), keratometry (K), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), central corneal thickness (CCT), and white-to-white (WTW) distance were recorded. Intraoperator repeatability and interoperator reproducibility of the IOLMaster 700 were analyzed using the test-retest (TRT), coefficients of variation (CoV), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). The agreement between the two devices was evaluated using the Bland-Altman method.
resultsThe repeatability and reproducibility of the SS-OCT optical biometer were high for all ocular biometry parameters in all groups, except for the WTW in cataract patients (TRT, 0.27-0.44 mm; ICC, 0.86-0.95). The reproducibility of averaged measurements from three consecutive readings (TRT : AL = 0.02 mm, CCT = 5.41
conclusionRepeatability and reproducibility of the new SS-OCT optical biometer were excellent and consistent with that of the standard biometer with respect to healthy children, healthy adults, and cataract patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.