Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32509335›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2020

Sacral fractures: issues, challenges, solutions.

Emmanuele Santolini, Nikolaos K Kanakaris, Peter V Giannoudis

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reported complications after spinopelvic fixation for U-type sacral fractures in older adults: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Knowledge gaps in high-energy sacral fracture treatment and management.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prone percutaneous Jungbluth for reduction of irreducible posterior pelvic ring injuries: a technical trick.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [Clinical and therapeutic analysis of 22 patients with traumatic spinopelvic dissociation].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emmanuele SantoliniAcademic Unit of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University of Genoa, Italy.
Nikolaos K KanakarisAcademic Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, LGI, University of Leeds, UK.
Peter V GiannoudisAcademic Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, LGI, University of Leeds, UK.
University of Leeds · GBUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sacral fractures are a heterogeneous group of fractures occurring in young people following road traffic accidents and falls from height, or in the elderly with osteoporosis following trivial trauma.This heterogeneity, combined with the low incidence of sacral fractures, determines a lack of experience amongst physicians, often leading to misdiagnosis, underestimation and inadequate treatment. The diagnosis should be made by assessing specific features during the clinical presentation, while computed tomography (CT) scan continues to be the choice of investigation.Sacral fractures can be treated non-operatively or surgically. Non-operative treatment is based on rest, pain relief therapy and early mobilization as tolerated. Surgical techniques can be split into two main groups: posterior pelvic fixation techniques and lumbopelvic fixation techniques. Anterior pelvic fixation techniques should be considered when sacral fractures are associated with anterior pelvic ring injuries, in order to increase stability and reduce the risk of posterior implant failure. To improve fracture reduction, different solutions could be adopted, including special positioning of the patient, manipulation techniques and use of specific reduction tools. Patients suffering from spinopelvic dissociation with associated neurologic lesions hardly ever recover completely, with residual lower-limb neurologic sequelae, urinary problems and sexual disfunction.Herein, we present issues, challenges and solutions related to the management of sacral fractures. Cite this article:

Indexed as

fixationlumbopelvic fixationneurological lesionsacral fracture

Identifiers

PMID32509335
PMCPMC7265089
OpenAlexW3021291472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.