Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32509332›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2020

'Frozen shoulder' is ill-defined. How can it be described better?

Sophie Abrassart, Franck Kolo, Sébastian Piotton, Joe Chih-Hao Chiu, Patrick Stirling, Pierre Hoffmeyer, Alexandre Lädermann

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05391984 (Effects of Activity Versus Structural Oriented Treatment Approach on Pain, Range of Motion, and Function in Patients With Frozen Shoulder.), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05391984 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Activity Versus Structural Oriented Treatment Approach on Pain, Range of Motion, and Function in Patients With Frozen Shoulder.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled30ConditionsFrozen ShoulderArmsActivity oriented treatment, Structural oriented treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The diagnostic value of physical examination tests in adhesive capsulitis: a systematic review.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Frozen shoulder: exploration of terminology and classification.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. An Instrument-Assisted Coracoid Pain Test: An Exploratory Diagnostic Accuracy Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sophie AbrassartDivision of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, La Tour Hospital, Meyrin, Switzerland.
Franck KoloRive Droite Radiology Centre, Geneva, Switzerland.
Sébastian PiottonDivision of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, La Tour Hospital, Meyrin, Switzerland.
Joe Chih-Hao ChiuDepartment of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Patrick StirlingReSurg SA, Nyon, Switzerland.
Pierre HoffmeyerDivision of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Alexandre LädermannDivision of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, La Tour Hospital, Meyrin, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frozen shoulder, a common and debilitating shoulder complaint, has been the subject of uncertainty within the scientific literature and clinical practice.We performed an electronic PubMed search on all (1559) articles mentioning 'frozen shoulder' or 'adhesive capsulitis' to understand and qualify the range of naming, classification and natural history of the disease. We identified and reviewed six key thought leadership papers published in the past 10 years and all (24) systematic reviews published on frozen shoulder or adhesive capsulitis in the past five years.This revealed that, while key thought leaders such as the ISAKOS Upper Extremity Council are unequivocal that 'adhesive capsulitis' is an inappropriate term, the long-term and short-term trends showed the literature (63% of systematic reviews assessed) preferred 'adhesive capsulitis'.The literature was divided as to whether or not to classify the complaint as

Indexed as

adhesive capsulitisclassificationfrozen shouldernamingnatural historyphasesprimarysecondary

Identifiers

PMID32509332
PMCPMC7265085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.