Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32509131›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of exercise science2020

Perceived and Heart Rate-based Intensities during Self-paced Walking: Magnitudes and Comparison.

Jennah E Flairty, Cory M Scheadler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of exercise science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Assessment of Exercise Intensity for Uphill Walking in Healthy Adults Performed Indoors and Outdoors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jennah E FlairtySchool of Kinesiology, Counseling & Rehabilitative Sciences, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, KY, USA.
Cory M ScheadlerSchool of Kinesiology, Counseling & Rehabilitative Sciences, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, KY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is limited research on self-paced walking and whether healthy individuals reach perceived exertion- (RPE) and/or heart rate- (HR) based moderate intensities. Study purpose was to determine if achieved RPE and HR intensities during a self-paced walk are of equivalent magnitude and whether they reach the recommended moderate-intensity. Thirty participants completed a 15-minute self-paced walk. RPE and HR were measured every two minutes; each measure was ranked by intensity. Wilcoxon matched pairs test revealed no significant difference between the mean ranked RPE and %HRmax (2.4 ± 0.9, 2.3 ± 1.0, respectively, p = 0.365). Only 37.5% of time-matched RPE and %HRmax were the same intensity. A slight positive Spearman's rho correlation (rs = 0.201, p = 0.002) was found. One-sample t-tests showed that RPE and %HRmax did not reach moderate intensity (p < 0.001). Individuals did not achieve moderate intensities when self-paced walking with varied RPE- and HR-based measures.

Indexed as

American College of Sports Medicinemoderate-intensityRating of Perceived Exertion

Identifiers

PMID32509131
PMCPMC7241645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.