ArticleInternational journal of exercise science2020
Comparison of Post-Activation Potentiating Stimuli on Jump and Sprint Performance.
Article in International journal of exercise science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- From Populations to Programming Variables: Post-Activation Performance Enhancement Following Isometric Contractions on Muscular Strength and Power-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.European journal of sport science · 2026Pooled it
- Optimizing Post-activation Performance Enhancement in Athletic Tasks: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis for Prescription Variables and Research Methods.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Pooled it
- Post-activation potentiation enhancement induction strategies with different rest intervals on jump performance: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Pooled it
- Trial
- Post activation potentiation effect of different preloading protocols on sprint performance.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Post activation performance enhancement effects on countermovement jumps in men and women.PloS one · 2026Article
- Acute effects of plyometric conditioning activities on sprint performance in sports individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- Article
- Personalized warm-up strategies for adult athletes: a meta-analysis based on athletic level, gender, and region.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
- Acute effects of eccentric overload training with different loading doses in male sprinters.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Exploring the potent enhancement effects of plyometric training on vertical jumping and sprinting ability in sports individuals.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Review
- Post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) protocols do not further increase jumping performance beyond warm-up effects: findings from three acute randomized crossover trials.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- Impact of warm-up methods on strength-speed for sprinters in athletics: a mini review.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-activation potentiation (PAP) is a phenomenon characterized by improved muscle performance based on the previous contractile activity of the muscle. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of different potentiating stimuli on jump and sprint performance in 13 resistance trained, college-aged men and women. After determining back squat 1 repetition max, subjects returned for testing on separate days to complete one of four interventions (dynamic resistance, weighted plyometric, isometric, or control) in a randomized order. A standardized warmup was performed, followed by a baseline countermovement jump (CMJ) and 20m sprint. Following warm-up and baseline measurements, subjects performed one of the four experimental conditions. CMJ and 20m sprint measurements were completed again at 20-seconds, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20-minutes. Results revealed significantly faster 0-20m sprint times (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.