ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental pathology2020
Aberrant expression of WWOX and its association with cancer stem cell biomarker expression.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Breast Cancer Stem Cell Membrane Biomarkers: Therapy Targeting and Clinical Implications.Cells · 2022Review
- The Role of Breast Cancer Stem Cell-Related Biomarkers as Prognostic Factors.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNanog and CD133 are biomarkers of cancer stem cells (CSCs) that regulate cancer progression. The WW domain-containing oxidoreductase (WWOX) is a tumor suppressor protein that can inhibit tumor cell proliferation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the expression and clinical significance of Nanog, CD133, and WWOX in infiltrating breast cancer (IBC).
methodsExpressions of Nanog, CD133, and WWOX in 204 IBC specimens and their corresponding control specimens were detected by immunohistochemistry. Patients' clinicopathologic and follow-up data were also collected.
resultsThe rates of positive expression of Nanog and CD133 were significantly higher in IBC specimens than in control specimens, and their expression was positively associated with tumor size, grade, and tumor stages, lymph node metastasis (LNM), and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage. The rate of positive expression of WWOX was significantly lower in IBC specimens than in control specimens, and its expression was inversely associated with tumor size, grade, and tumor stages, LNM, and TNM stage. Patients whose specimens expressed Nanog, CD133, or HER2 had a reduced overall survival (OS) when compared with patients not expressing these proteins. However, patients whose specimens expressed WWOX, ER, or PR had an increased OS when compared with patients who did not show expression. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that expression of Nanog, CD133, WWOX, ER, and HER2, and the TNM stage were independent prognostic factors for IBC patients.
conclusionsTherefore, Nanog, CD133, and WWOX should be considered as promising prognostic factors and therapeutic targets in IBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32509092PMC7270669W3033362781What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.