Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32509049›Full record

ReviewBiomicrofluidics2020

Passive micropumping in microfluidics for point-of-care testing.

Linfeng Xu, Anyang Wang, Xiangpeng Li, Kwang W Oh

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomicrofluidics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Periodic Flows in Microfluidics.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Microfluidic pumps for cell sorting.Biomicrofluidics · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. A frugal microfluidic pump.Lab on a chip · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Linfeng XuDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Schools of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, 1700 4th Street, Byers Hall 304, San Francisco, California 94158, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6386-1815
Anyang WangSMALL (Sensors and MicroActuators Learning Lab), Department of Electrical Engineering, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York 14260, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1897-8915
Xiangpeng LiDepartment of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Schools of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of California San Francisco, 1700 4th Street, Byers Hall 304, San Francisco, California 94158, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4230-5676
Kwang W OhSMALL (Sensors and MicroActuators Learning Lab), Department of Electrical Engineering, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York 14260, USA.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Suitable micropumping methods for flow control represent a major technical hurdle in the development of microfluidic systems for point-of-care testing (POCT). Passive micropumping for point-of-care microfluidic systems provides a promising solution to such challenges, in particular, passive micropumping based on capillary force and air transfer based on the air solubility and air permeability of specific materials. There have been numerous developments and applications of micropumping techniques that are relevant to the use in POCT. Compared with active pumping methods such as syringe pumps or pressure pumps, where the flow rate can be well-tuned independent of the design of the microfluidic devices or the property of the liquids, most passive micropumping methods still suffer flow-control problems. For example, the flow rate may be set once the device has been made, and the properties of liquids may affect the flow rate. However, the advantages of passive micropumping, which include simplicity, ease of use, and low cost, make it the best choice for POCT. Here, we present a systematic review of different types of passive micropumping that are suitable for POCT, alongside existing applications based on passive micropumping. Future trends in passive micropumping are also discussed.

Identifiers

PMID32509049
PMCPMC7263483
OpenAlexW3029510488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.