ArticleAlgorithms for molecular biology : AMB2020
Evolution through segmental duplications and losses: a Super-Reconciliation approach.
Article in Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying the Influence of Genetic Context on Duplicated Mammalian Genes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- FullSynesth: Syntenic Reconciliation of a Set of Consistent Gene Trees.Theory of computing systems · 2026Article
- Quantifying the influence of genetic context on duplicated mammalian genes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Predicting horizontal gene transfers with perfect transfer networks.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2024Article
- WGDTree: a phylogenetic software tool to examine conditional probabilities of retention following whole genome duplication events.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Molecular evolution and diversification of phytoene synthase (PSY) gene family.Genetics and molecular biology · 2022Article
- Maximum parsimony reconciliation in the DTLOR model.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Gene tree and species tree reconciliation with endosymbiotic gene transfer.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- FastMulRFS: fast and accurate species tree estimation under generic gene duplication and loss models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Genome-wide patterns of homoeologous gene flow in allotetraploid coffee.Applications in plant sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The classical gene and species tree reconciliation, used to infer the history of gene gain and loss explaining the evolution of gene families, assumes an independent evolution for each family. While this assumption is reasonable for genes that are far apart in the genome, it is not appropriate for genes grouped into syntenic blocks, which are more plausibly the result of a concerted evolution. Here, we introduce the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.