Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32508974›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2020

Interpretable Learning Approaches in Resting-State Functional Connectivity Analysis: The Case of Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Jinlong Hu, Lijie Cao, Tenghui Li, Bin Liao, Shoubin Dong, Ping Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. NF-GAT: A Node Feature-Based Graph Attention Network for ASD Classification.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jinlong HuSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3602-7603
Lijie CaoSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6763-8768
Tenghui LiSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8810-962X
Bin LiaoCollege of Mathematics and Informatics, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3422-9092
Shoubin DongSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0153-850X
Ping LiFaculty of Humanities, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep neural networks have recently been applied to the study of brain disorders such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) with great success. However, the internal logics of these networks are difficult to interpret, especially with regard to how specific network architecture decisions are made. In this paper, we study an interpretable neural network model as a method to identify ASD participants from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data and interpret results of the model in a precise and consistent manner. First, we propose an interpretable fully connected neural network (FCNN) to classify two groups, ASD versus healthy controls (HC), based on input data from resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) between regions of interests (ROIs). The proposed FCNN model is a piecewise linear neural network (PLNN) which uses piecewise linear function LeakyReLU as its activation function. We experimentally compared the FCNN model against widely used classification models including support vector machine (SVM), random forest, and two new classes of deep neural network models in a large dataset containing 871 subjects from ABIDE I database. The results show the proposed FCNN model achieves the highest classification accuracy. Second, we further propose an interpreting method which could explain the trained model precisely with a precise linear formula for each input sample and decision features which contributed most to the classification of ASD versus HC participants in the model. We also discuss the implications of our proposed approach for fMRI data classification and interpretation.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAutism Spectrum DisorderCase-Control StudiesComputational BiologyConnectomeDatabases, FactualFunctional NeuroimagingHumansLinear ModelsMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID32508974
PMCPMC7251440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.