Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32508928›Full record

ArticleObstetrics and gynecology international2020

Risk Factors for Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries among Women Delivering at a Tertiary Hospital in Southwestern Uganda.

Mahad Ali, Richard Migisha, Joseph Ngonzi, Joy Muhumuza, Ronald Mayanja, Jolly Joe Lapat, Wasswa Salongo, Musa Kayondo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Obstetrics and gynecology international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mahad AliDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, P.O Box 1410, Uganda.
Richard MigishaDepartment of Physiology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, P.O Box 1410, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1709-9521
Joseph NgonziDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, P.O Box 1410, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5253-9516
Joy MuhumuzaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, P.O Box 1410, Uganda.
Ronald MayanjaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, P.O Box 1410, Uganda.
Jolly Joe LapatDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, P.O Box 1410, Uganda.
Wasswa SalongoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, P.O Box 1410, Uganda.
Musa KayondoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, P.O Box 1410, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) arise from perineal trauma during vaginal delivery and are associated with poor maternal health outcomes. Most OASIS occur in unattended deliveries in resource-limited settings. However, even in facilities where deliveries are attended by skilled personnel, a number of women still get OASIS.

objectivesTo determine the incidence and risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries among women delivering at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital (MRRH).

methodsWe conducted an unmatched hospital-based case control study, with the ratio of cases to controls of 1 : 2 (80 cases and 160 controls). We defined a case as a mother who got a third- or fourth-degree perineal tear after vaginal delivery while the controls recruited were the next two mothers who delivered vaginally without a third- or fourth-degree perineal tear. A questionnaire and participants' medical records review were used to obtain sociodemographic and clinical data. We estimated the incidence of OASIS and performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression to identify the associated risk factors.

resultsThe cumulative incidence for OASIS during the study period was 6.6%. The risk factors for OASIS were 2

Identifiers

PMID32508928
PMCPMC7244954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.