Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32508907›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2020

Diagnosis of Asthma Based on Routine Blood Biomarkers Using Machine Learning.

Jun Zhan, Wen Chen, Longsheng Cheng, Qiong Wang, Feifei Han, Yubao Cui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Angiogenesis Factors as Emerging Circulating Biomarkers in Asthma.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Predict the Airway Disorders Illness: A Systematic Review.Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2023
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jun ZhanSchool of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu Province, China.
Wen ChenDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Wuxi People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi 214023, Jiangsu Province, China.
Longsheng ChengSchool of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, Jiangsu Province, China.
Qiong WangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Wuxi People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi 214023, Jiangsu Province, China.
Feifei HanDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Wuxi People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi 214023, Jiangsu Province, China.
Yubao CuiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Wuxi People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi 214023, Jiangsu Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7736-8012

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intelligent medical diagnosis has become common in the era of big data, although this technique has been applied to asthma only in limited contexts. Using routine blood biomarkers to identify asthma patients would make clinical diagnosis easier to implement and would enhance research of key asthma variables through data mining techniques. We used routine blood data from healthy individuals to construct a Mahalanobis space (MS). Then, we calculated Mahalanobis distances of the training routine blood data from 355 asthma patients and 1,480 healthy individuals to ensure the efficiency of MS. Orthogonal arrays and signal-to-noise ratios were used to optimize blood biomarker variables. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the threshold value. Ultimately, we validated the system on 182 individuals based on the threshold value. Out of 35 patients with asthma, MTS correctly classified 94.15% of patients. In addition, 97.20% of 147 healthy individuals were correctly classified. The system isolated 7 routine blood biomarkers. Among these biomarkers, platelet distribution width, mean platelet volume, white blood cell count, eosinophil count, and lymphocyte ratio performed well in asthma diagnosis. In brief, MTS shows promise as an accurate method to identify asthma patients based on 7 vital blood biomarker variables and threshold determined by the ROC curve, thus offering the potential to simplify diagnostic complexity and optimize clinical efficiency.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAsthmaBiomarkersHumansLymphocyte CountROC CurveBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID32508907
PMCPMC7244973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.