ReviewInterventional neurology2020
Neuroendovascular Cerebral Sinus Stenting in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.
Review in Interventional neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutic role of venous sinus stenting in pediatric IIH: evidence review for clinical practice.Acta neurochirurgica · 2025Pooled it
- Prevalence of Venous Sinus Stenosis in Spontaneous Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak and the Role for Venous Sinus Stenting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2025Pooled it
- Endovascular approaches to neural interfacing: lessons from cardiovascular technologies.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Combined Conduit Score in Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Venography in Patients with Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension : Neuro-interventionalists' vs. Radiologists' Assessment.Clinical neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Dural venous sinus stenting technique for idiopathic intracranial hypertension in patients with tortuous venous anatomy.Neurosurgical review · 2023Article
- Management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension in pregnancy.Obstetric medicine · 2022Review
- A Unique Subset: Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension Presenting as Spontaneous CSF Leak of the Anterior Skull Base.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2022Article
- New Options (or not) for Treatment of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2022Review
- Casper Versus Precise Stent for the Treatment of Patients with Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.Clinical neuroradiology · 2021Article
- Trends in the Surgical Treatment of Pseudotumor Cerebri Syndrome in the United States.JAMA network open · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a rare, ill-understood disease of significant morbidity. Because the pathophysiology is poorly understood, treatment protocols are not uniform and are directed towards alleviating the most common symptoms: headache and visual loss. In this review, we analyze 25 case series, all of which included IIH patients (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.