Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32508802›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020

Inhibition of Fungal Growth and Induction of a Novel Volatilome in Response to

Ghazal Ebadzadsahrai, Emily A Higgins Keppler, Scott D Soby, Heather D Bean

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mycoremediation of Petroleum-Contaminated Soil Using NativeJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. NovelBiotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Volatilomes of human infection.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Applied and environmental microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ghazal EbadzadsahraiCollege of Science, Engineering and Technology, Grand Canyon University, Phoenix, AZ, United States.
Emily A Higgins KepplerSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Scott D SobyBiomedical Sciences Program, College of Graduate Studies, Midwestern University, Glendale, AZ, United States.
Heather D BeanSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of chemical bioactivity in the rhizosphere has recently broadened to include microbial metabolites, and their roles in niche construction and competition via growth promotion, growth inhibition, and toxicity. Several prior studies have identified bacteria that produce volatile organic compounds (VOCs) with antifungal activities, indicating their potential use as biocontrol organisms to suppress phytopathogenic fungi and reduce agricultural losses. We sought to expand the roster of soil bacteria with known antifungal VOCs by testing bacterial isolates from wild and cultivated cranberry bog soils for VOCs that inhibit the growth of four common fungal and oomycete plant pathogens, and

Indexed as

emergent propertiesfungal pathogen antagonisminter-kingdom communicationquorum sensing (QS)semiochemical communicationvolatile organic compound (VOC)

Identifiers

PMID32508802
PMCPMC7251293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.