Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32508702›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychology2020

Towards an Individual Differences Perspective in Mindfulness Training Research: Theoretical and Empirical Considerations.

Rongxiang Tang, Todd S Braver

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rongxiang TangDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Todd S BraverDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.

Funding

NEURAL MECHANISMS OF MINDFULNESS: A DISCORDANT TWIN DESIGNR21AT009483 · NCCIH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BRAVER, TODD S · 2017 to 2018
$419k
Examining Mindfulness Training Effects and Mechanisms on Cognitive ControlF31AT010422 · NCCIH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI TANG, RONGXIANG · 2019 to 2020
$78k
NCCIH NIH HHS F31 AT010422NCCIH NIH HHS R21 AT009483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing body of research indicates that mindfulness training can have beneficial effects on critical aspects of psychological well-being, cognitive function, and brain health. Although these benefits have been generalized to the population level, individual variability in observed effects of mindfulness training has not been systematically investigated. Research on other similar forms of psychological intervention demonstrates that individual differences are prominent in terms of intervention responsiveness and outcomes. Furthermore, individual characteristics such as personality traits have been shown to play a crucial role in influencing the effects of intervention. In light of these lines of evidence, we review representative work on individual differences in mindfulness training and advocate for an individual difference perspective in mindfulness training research. We discuss relevant empirical evidence of individual differences potentially influencing behavioral outcomes of mindfulness training, focusing on both cognitive function and psychological well-being. Finally, theoretical considerations and potentially fruitful research strategies and directions for studying individual differences in mindfulness training are discussed, including those involving cognitive neuroscience methods.

Indexed as

dispositionindividual differencesmeditationmindfulness trainingpersonality traitspersonalized medicineprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID32508702
PMCPMC7248295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.