Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32508570›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2020

Transcranial Static Magnetic Field Stimulation of the Motor Cortex in Children.

Asha Hollis, Ephrem Zewdie, Alberto Nettel-Aguirre, Alicia Hilderley, Hsing-Ching Kuo, Helen L Carlson, Adam Kirton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Static Magnetic Field Stimulation Enhances Shunting Inhibition via a SLC26 Family ClThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Asha HollisCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Ephrem ZewdieDepartment of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Alberto Nettel-AguirreDepartment of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Alicia HilderleyHotchkiss Brain Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Hsing-Ching KuoDepartment of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Helen L CarlsonDepartment of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Adam KirtonDepartment of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
University of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-invasive neuromodulation is an emerging therapy for children with early brain injury but is difficult to apply to preschoolers when windows of developmental plasticity are optimal. Transcranial static magnetic field stimulation (tSMS) decreases primary motor cortex (M1) excitability in adults but effects on the developing brain are unstudied. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: We aimed to determine the effects of tSMS on cortical excitability and motor learning in healthy children. We hypothesized that tSMS over right M1 would reduce cortical excitability and inhibit contralateral motor learning.

methodsThis randomized, sham-controlled, double-blinded, three-arm, cross-over trial enrolled 24 healthy children aged 10-18 years. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) assessed cortical excitability via motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude and paired pulse measures. Motor learning was assessed via the Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT). A tSMS magnet (677 Newtons) or sham was held over left or right M1 for 30 min while participants trained the non-dominant hand. A linear mixed effect model was used to examine intervention effects.

resultsAll 72 tSMS sessions were well tolerated without serious adverse effects. Neither cortical excitability as measured by MEPs nor paired-pulse intracortical neurophysiology was altered by tSMS. Possible behavioral effects included contralateral tSMS inhibiting early motor learning (

conclusiontSMS is feasible in pediatric populations. Unlike adults, tSMS did not produce measurable changes in MEP amplitude. Possible effects of M1 tSMS on motor learning require further study. Our findings support further exploration of tSMS neuromodulation in young children with cerebral palsy.

Indexed as

motor learningneuromodulationneurophysiologynon-invasive brain stimulationpediatricstSMS

Identifiers

PMID32508570
PMCPMC7248312
OpenAlexW3028149264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.