ArticleJournal of pesticide science2020
Study on the biodegradation of persistent organic pollutants (POPs).
Article in Journal of pesticide science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anaerobic microbial degradation of persistent organic pollutants in aquatic sediments: implications of climate change.Archives of microbiology · 2025Review
- Metagenome-Assembled Genomes and Metatranscriptome Analysis of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate-Reducing Bacteria Enriched From Activated Sludge.Environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Sampling efficiency of a polyurethane foam air sampler: Effect of temperature.Environmental science and ecotechnology · 2024Article
- Analysis of the Influence ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- mibPOPdb: An online database for microbial biodegradation of persistent organic pollutants.iMeta · 2022Article
- Mechanisms of aerobic dechlorination of hexachlorobenzene and pentachlorophenol byJournal of pesticide science · 2021Article
- Adsorption of lindane (γ-hexachlorocyclohexane) on nickel modified graphitic carbon nitride: a theoretical study.RSC advances · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of organochlorine pesticides, such as dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and benzene hexachloride (BHC), have contributed substantially to the increase and stable supply of food production post-World War II. However, they have also become a major source of pollution on a global scale due to their persistence in the environment, high bioconcentration, toxicity, and their long-distance mobility. Although the use and production of these pesticides were banned over 45 years ago, they still present a risk to human health and ecosystems, and pose a threat to food safety. These pesticides were designated as persistent organic pollutants (POPs) by the Stockholm Convention in 2001, which urged the industry to reduce or eliminate them globally. The authors of this study have been involved in the research and development of bioaugmentation soil remediation technology to reduce the risk of environmental and crop contamination originating from POPs. In this paper, these studies are summarized, from basic studies (1, 2, 3) to an applied study (4), as follows: (1) use of the soil-charcoal perfusion method to explore POP-degrading bacteria, (2) bacteriological characteristics, metabolic pathways and dechlorination genes of the hexaclorobenzene (HCB)-mineralizing bacterial strain PD653, (3) characteristics and metabolic pathways of the dieldrin-degrading bacterial strain KSF27, and (4) application of these degrading bacteria for remediation of POPs-contaminated soil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.