Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32508258›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of public health2021

A validation study of the Norwegian version of the Health Literacy Questionnaire: A robust nine-dimension factor model.

Astrid K Wahl, Åsmund Hermansen, Richard H Osborne, Marie Hamilton Larsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Developing a validity testing plan for a patient-reported outcome measure in a new context using the argument-based approach to validity.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Astrid K WahlDepartment of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5545-5710
Åsmund HermansenDepartment of Social Work, Child Welfare and Social Policy, Faculty of Social Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway.
Richard H OsborneCentre for Global Health and Equity, Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Australia.
Marie Hamilton LarsenDepartment of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Health LiteracySurveys and QuestionnairesAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultConfirmatory factor analysisHealth Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ)psoriasispsychometric testingvalidity testing

Identifiers

PMID32508258
PMCPMC8135233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.