Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32508140›Full record

SynthesisCartilage2021

Pain and Functional Scores in Patients Affected by Knee OA after Treatment with Pulsed Electromagnetic and Magnetic Fields: A Meta-Analysis.

Marco Viganò, Carlotta Perucca Orfei, Enrico Ragni, Alessandra Colombini, Laura de Girolamo

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cartilage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marco ViganòIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6463-6564
Carlotta Perucca OrfeiIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milano, Italy.
Enrico RagniIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milano, Italy.
Alessandra ColombiniIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milano, Italy.
Laura de GirolamoIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milano, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of electromagnetic field treatment on the symptoms of knee osteoarthritis (OA). In addition, the influence of the type of control group and other covariates have been investigated to identify the sources of heterogeneity in the results of the available clinical trials.

methodsRandomized controlled trials reporting pulsed electromagnetic field-based therapies for the treatment of knee OA have been included. Main outcomes were self-reported pain and activity scores collected by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and/or Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at short term after treatment.

resultsThirteen studies comprising 914 unique patients were included in the analysis. Overall reduction in pain score was observed after treatment (standardized mean difference -0.4059,

conclusionsPulsed electromagnetic field therapy effectively relieves knee OA symptoms at short term, but it is not superior to other conservative therapies such as physiotherapy.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneeHumansMagnetic FieldsPainPain MeasurementPhysical Therapy Modalitiesbiophysical therapydiagnosisjoint involvedkneeosteoarthritispulsed electromagnetic fields

Identifiers

PMID32508140
PMCPMC8808910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.