Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32507999›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2020

Factors influencing the need for recovery in employees with hearing loss: a cross-sectional study of health administrative data.

Hanneke E M van der Hoek-Snieders, Monique Boymans, Bas Sorgdrager, Wouter A Dreschler

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. The relationship between hearing status, listening effort, and the need for recovery in employees of a manufacturing company.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hanneke E M van der Hoek-SniedersAmsterdam UMC, Department of Clinical and Experimental Audiology, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. h.e.vanderhoek@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3947-4399
Monique BoymansAmsterdam UMC, Department of Clinical and Experimental Audiology, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bas SorgdragerAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands Centre of Occupational Diseases, Coronel Institute AmCOGG, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wouter A DreschlerAmsterdam UMC, Department of Clinical and Experimental Audiology, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLAmsterdam Neuroscience · NLNetherlands Center for Occupational Diseases · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveNeed for recovery is a predictor of work stress and health problems, but its underlying factors are not yet well understood. We aimed to identify hearing-related, work-related, and personal factors influencing need for recovery in hearing-impaired employees.

methodsWe retrospectively identified hearing-impaired employees (N = 294) that were referred to the Amsterdam University Medical Center between 2004 and 2019. Routinely obtained healthcare data were used, including a survey and hearing assessments. A directed acyclic graph was constructed, revealing the hypothesized structure of factors influencing need for recovery as well as the minimal set of factors needed for multiple regression analysis.

resultsFour variables were included in the regression analysis. In total, 46.1% of the variance in need for recovery was explained by the factors feeling that something should change at work (B = 19.01, p < 0.001), self-perceived listening effort (B = 1.84, p < 0.001), personal adaptations scale score (B = - 0.34, p < .001), and having a moderate/poor general health condition (B = 20.06, p < 0.001). Although degree of hearing loss was associated with self-perceived listening effort, the direct association between degree of hearing loss and need for recovery was not significant.

conclusionsThe results suggest that the way employees perceive their hearing loss and how they cope with it directly influence need for recovery, rather than their measured degree of hearing loss. Additionally, general health condition was found to be an independent factor for need for recovery. The results should be confirmed by future, longitudinal research.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFatigueFemaleHearing LossHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsOccupational StressRetrospective StudiesCommunication strategiesFatigueHearing lossListening effortWorkersWork participation

Identifiers

PMID32507999
PMCPMC7519912
OpenAlexW4236641157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.