Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32507992›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2020

The cortical oscillatory patterns associated with varying levels of reward during an effortful vigilance task.

Adam Byrne, Katerina Kokmotou, Hannah Roberts, Vicente Soto, John Tyson-Carr, Danielle Hewitt, Timo Giesbrecht, Andrej Stancak

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Adam ByrneDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZA, UK. adam.byrne@liv.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0761-3929
Katerina KokmotouDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZA, UK.
Hannah RobertsDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZA, UK.
Vicente SotoDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZA, UK.
John Tyson-CarrDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZA, UK.
Danielle HewittDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZA, UK.
Timo GiesbrechtUnilever Research and Development, Port Sunlight, UK.
Andrej StancakDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZA, UK.
University of Liverpool · GBUnilever (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council ep/l015927/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We explored how reward and value of effort shapes performance in a sustained vigilance, reaction time (RT) task. It was posited that reward and value would hasten RTs and increase cognitive effort by boosting activation in the sensorimotor cortex and inhibition in the frontal cortex, similar to the horse-race model of motor actions. Participants performed a series of speeded responses while expecting differing monetary rewards (0 pence (p), 1 p, and 10 p) if they responded faster than their median RT. Amplitudes of cortical alpha, beta, and theta oscillations were analysed using the event-related desynchronization method. In experiment 1 (N = 29, with 12 females), reward was consistent within block, while in experiment 2 (N = 17, with 12 females), reward amount was displayed before each trial. Each experiment evaluated the baseline amplitude of cortical oscillations differently. The value of effort was evaluated using a cognitive effort discounting task (COGED). In both experiments, RTs decreased significantly with higher rewards. Reward level sharpened the increased amplitudes of beta oscillations during fast responses in experiment 1. In experiment 2, reward decreased the amplitudes of beta oscillations in the ipsilateral sensorimotor cortex. Individual effort values did not significantly correlate with oscillatory changes in either experiment. Results suggest that reward level and response speed interacted with the task- and baseline-dependent patterns of cortical inhibition in the frontal cortex and with activation in the sensorimotor cortex during the period of motor preparation in a sustained vigilance task. However, neither the shortening of RT with increasing reward nor the value of effort correlated with oscillatory changes. This implies that amplitudes of cortical oscillations may shape upcoming motor responses but do not translate higher-order motivational factors into motor performance.

Indexed as

RewardWakefulnessAnimalsCognitionFemaleHorsesMotivationReaction TimeCognitive effortDiscountingEvent-related desynchronizationValue

Identifiers

PMID32507992
PMCPMC7438383
OpenAlexW3033676376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.