Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32507905›Full record

ArticleThe ultrasound journal2020

Point-of-care ultrasound for the detection of hydronephrosis in emergency department patients with suspected renal colic.

Stephanie Sibley, Nathan Roth, Charles Scott, Louise Rang, Heather White, Marco L A Sivilotti, Eric Bruder

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ultrasound journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01323842 (Hydro II), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01323842 completednot on this map

Hydro II: Emergency Department Ultrasound in Renal Colic

TypeobservationalSponsorQueen's UniversityRan2011 to 2013Enrolled414ConditionsRenal Colic, Hydronephrosis, Abdominal Aortic AneurysmArmsEDTU
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Point-of-care ultrasound Usage and accuracy within a Canadian urology division.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie SibleyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. stephanie.sibley@kingstonhsc.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2229-9747
Nathan RothSchool of Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Charles ScottDepartment of Radiology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Louise RangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Heather WhiteDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Marco L A SivilottiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Eric BruderDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Queen's University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPoint-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) by emergency physicians for renal colic has been proposed as an alternative to computed tomography (CT) to avoid ionizing radiation exposure and shorten emergency department length of stay. Previous studies have employed experienced or credentialed ultrasonographers or required advanced ultrasound skills. We sought to measure the diagnostic accuracy of PoCUS by physicians with varied experience using a simplified binary outcome of presence or absence of hydronephrosis. Secondary outcomes include assessment as to whether the presence of hydronephrosis on PoCUS is predictive of complications, and to evaluate possible causes for the reduced diagnostic accuracy such as body mass index (BMI) and time between PoCUS and formal imaging, and scanner experience.

results413 patients were enrolled in the study. PoCUS showed a specificity of 71.8% [95% CI 65.0, 77.9] and sensitivity of 77.1% [95% CI 70.9, 82.6]. Hydronephrosis on PoCUS was predictive of complications (relative risk 3.13; [95% CI 1.30, 7.53]). The time interval between PoCUS and formal imaging, BMI, and scanner experience did not influence the accuracy of PoCUS.

conclusionsPoCUS for hydronephrosis in suspected renal colic has moderate accuracy when performed by providers with varied experience for the binary outcome of presence or absence of hydronephrosis. Hydronephrosis on PoCUS is associated with increased rates of complications. PoCUS for hydronephrosis is limited in its utility as a stand-alone test, however this inexpensive, readily available test may be useful in conjunction with clinical course to determine which patients would benefit from formal imaging or urologic consultation. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01323842.

Indexed as

BMIEmergency departmentHydronephrosisPoCUSPoint-of-care ultrasoundRenal colic

Identifiers

PMID32507905
PMCPMC7276462
OpenAlexW3033461640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.