ReviewHerz2020
Optimal antiplatelet and anticoagulation strategies in acute coronary syndromes.
Review in Herz, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of interventional cardiology · 2021Pooled it
- Regulation of Key Antiplatelet Pathways by Bioactive Compounds with Minimal Bleeding Risk.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antithrombotic therapy has become increasingly challenging due to the thrombotic and bleeding risk of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) today. Contributing factors include increasing age, underlying comorbidities (e.g., renal failure, atrial fibrillation [AF]), or concomitant interventions including transcatheter valve procedures requiring individualized antithrombotic strategies. Thanks to the development of novel stent platforms with biocompatible polymers and thin strut design allowing for a more rapid endothelialization, shortening or de-escalation of antiplatelet therapies is an attractive option for reducing bleeding events. In fact, several trials have been recently published or are currently underway that address the issue of early monotherapy after short-term dual antiplatelet therapy in ACS patients. Patients with AF and ACS are at a particularly high risk for thromboembolic and bleeding events. An individualized combination approach of antiplatelet therapy plus non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants should be favored in these patients to reduce bleeding risk according to recent randomized trials and guidelines. In contrast to de-escalation strategies in ACS patients at high bleeding risk, in patients with myocardial infarction in whom the long-term risk for ischemic events prevails, prolongation of an intensified antithrombotic therapy on top of acetylsalicylic acid is recommended. This review summarizes the recent evidence and offers practical recommendations to determine patients' bleeding versus thrombo-ischemic risk in order to tailor early and late antithrombotic therapy after ACS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.