Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32507855›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2020

Cervical screening: ESGO-EFC position paper of the European Society of Gynaecologic Oncology (ESGO) and the European Federation of Colposcopy (EFC).

Maria Kyrgiou, Marc Arbyn, Christine Bergeron, F Xavier Bosch, Joakim Dillner, Mark Jit, Jane Kim, Mario Poljak, Pekka Nieminen, Peter Sasieni and 3 more

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. European Cancer Prevention Organization on cancer screening: an expert panel position paper.European journal of cancer prevention : the official journal of the European Cancer Prevention Organisation (ECP) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Concurrent cervical and extra cervical HPV-related lesions: an observational study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A guide to cancer screening.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Microbiome, Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Carcinogenesis.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2026
    Review

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Maria KyrgiouDepartment of Surgery and Cancer - Gut, Metabolism and Reproduction IRDB, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, W12 0NN, UK. m.kyrgiou@imperial.ac.uk.
Marc ArbynUnit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Centre, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Christine BergeronDepartment of Pathology, Laboratoire Cerba, 95066, Cergy Pontoise, Cedex 9, France.
F Xavier BoschCancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Barcelona, Spain.
Joakim DillnerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institut, Stockholm, Sweden.
Mark JitDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Jane KimHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Health Decision Science, 718 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Mario PoljakInstitute of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Pekka NieminenUniversity of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Peter SasieniKing's Clinical Trials Unit, King's University, London, UK.
Vesna KesicMedical Faculty, University of Belgrade; Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical center of Serbia, Beograd, Serbia.
Jack CuzickWolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine - Barts and The London, Queen's Mary University, Charterhouse Square, EC1M 6BQ, London, UK.
Murat GultekinDivision of Gynaecological Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16891Cancer Research UK 27047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper summarises the position of ESGO and EFC on cervical screening based on existing guidelines and opinions of a team of lead experts. HPV test is replacing cytology as this offers greater protection against cervical cancer and allows longer screening intervals. Only a dozen of HPV tests are considered as clinically validated for screening. The lower specificity of HPV test dictates the use of triage tests that can select women for colposcopy. Reflex cytology is currently the only well validated triage test; HPV genotyping and p16 immunostaining may be used in the future, although methylation assays and viral load also look promising. A summary of quality assurance benchmarks is provided, and the importance to audit the screening histories of women who developed cancer is noted as a key objective. HPV-based screening is more cost-effective than cytology or cotesting. HPV-based screening should continue in the post-vaccination era. Only a fraction of the female population is vaccinated, and this varies across countries. A major challenge will be to personalise screening frequency according to vaccination status. Still the most important factor for successful prevention by screening is high population coverage and organised screening. Screening with self-sampling to reach under-screened women is promising.

Indexed as

Cervix UteriConsensusCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Early Detection of CancerFemaleGenotyping TechniquesHumansPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancySensitivity and SpecificityUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaccinationViral LoadCDKN2A protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Papillomavirus Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID32507855
PMCPMC7434873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.