Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32507853›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2020

Oestrogen receptor pathway activity is associated with outcome in endometrial cancer.

Willem Jan van Weelden, Louis J M van der Putten, Márcia A Inda, Anne van Brussel, Marc P L M Snijders, Lisanne M M Schriever, Johan Bulten, Leon F A G Massuger, Anja van de Stolpe, Johanna M A Pijnenborg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evolving treatment paradigms in metastatic or recurrent low-grade endometrial cancer: When is hormonal-based therapy the preferred option?International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Willem Jan van Weelden *Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud Institute for Health Science, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. willemjan.vanweelden@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5413-9556
Louis J M van der Putten *Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud Institute for Health Science, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Márcia A IndaPhilips Research, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Anne van BrusselPhilips Research, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Marc P L M SnijdersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Lisanne M M SchrieverDepartment of Pathology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Johan BultenDepartment of Pathology, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Leon F A G MassugerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud Institute for Health Science, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Anja van de StolpePhilips Research, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Johanna M A PijnenborgDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud Institute for Health Science, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLPhilips (Netherlands) · NLCanisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOestrogen receptor (ER) expression is a prognostic biomarker in endometrial cancer (EC). However, expression does not provide information about the functional activity of the ER pathway. We evaluated a model to quantify ER pathway activity in EC, and determined the prognostic relevance of ER pathway activity.

methodsER pathway activity was measured in two publicly available datasets with endometrial and EC tissue, and one clinical cohort with 107 samples from proliferative and hyperplastic endometrium and endometrioid-type EC (EEC) and uterine serous cancer (USC). ER pathway activity scores were inferred from ER target gene mRNA levels from Affymetrix microarray data (public datasets), or measured by qPCR on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples (clinical cohort) and related to ER expression and outcome.

resultsER pathway activity scores differed significantly throughout the menstrual cycle supporting the validity of the pathway test. The highest ER pathway scores were found in proliferative and hyperplastic endometrium and stage I EEC, whereas stage II-IV EEC and USCs had significantly lower levels. Low ER pathway activity was associated with recurrent disease, and added prognostic value in patients with low ER expression.

conclusionThe ER pathway test reflects activity of the ER pathway, and may improve prediction of outcome in EC patients.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, EndometrioidCohort StudiesEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPrecancerous ConditionsPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneRNA, MessengerReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID32507853
PMCPMC7463017
OpenAlexW3033912978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.