Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32506927›Full record

ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2020

Adverse Pregnancy Conditions Among Privately Insured Women With and Without Congenital Heart Defects.

Karrie F Downing, Naomi K Tepper, Regina M Simeone, Elizabeth C Ailes, Michelle Gurvitz, Sheree L Boulet, Margaret A Honein, Penelope P Howards, Anne M Valente, Sherry L Farr

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Positive Predictive Value ofJournal of the American Heart Association · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Reproductive Health of Women with Congenital Heart Defects.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Karrie F DowningDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities (K.F.D., R.M.S., E.C.A., M.A.H., S.L.F.), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Naomi K TepperDivision of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (N.K.T.), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Regina M SimeoneDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities (K.F.D., R.M.S., E.C.A., M.A.H., S.L.F.), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Elizabeth C AilesDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities (K.F.D., R.M.S., E.C.A., M.A.H., S.L.F.), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Michelle GurvitzDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (M.G., A.M.V.).
Sheree L BouletDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA (S.L.B.).
Margaret A HoneinDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities (K.F.D., R.M.S., E.C.A., M.A.H., S.L.F.), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Penelope P HowardsDepartment of Epidemiology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA (P.P.H.).
Anne M ValenteDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (M.G., A.M.V.).
Sherry L FarrDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities (K.F.D., R.M.S., E.C.A., M.A.H., S.L.F.), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USEmory University · USNational Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background In women with congenital heart defects (CHD), changes in blood volume, heart rate, respiration, and edema during pregnancy may lead to increased risk of adverse outcomes and conditions. The American Heart Association recommends providers of pregnant women with CHD assess cardiac health and discuss risks and benefits of cardiac-related medications. We described receipt of American Heart Association-recommended cardiac evaluations, filled potentially teratogenic or fetotoxic (Food and Drug Administration pregnancy category D/X) cardiac-related prescriptions, and adverse conditions among pregnant women with CHD compared with those without CHD. Methods and Results Using 2007 to 2014 US healthcare claims data, we ascertained a retrospective cohort of women with and without CHD aged 15 to 44 years with private insurance covering prescriptions during pregnancy. CHD was defined as ≥1 inpatient code or ≥2 outpatient CHD diagnosis codes >30 days apart documented outside of pregnancy and categorized as severe or nonsevere. Log-linear regression, accounting for multiple pregnancies per woman, generated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) for associations between the presence/severity of CHD and stillbirth, preterm birth, and adverse conditions from the last menstrual period to 90 days postpartum. We identified 2056 women with CHD (2334 pregnancies) and 1 374 982 women without (1 524 077 pregnancies). During the last menstrual period to 90 days postpartum, 56% of women with CHD had comprehensive echocardiograms and, during pregnancy, 4% filled potentially teratogenic or fetotoxic cardiac-related prescriptions. Women with CHD, compared with those without, experienced more adverse conditions overall (aPR, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.7-2.1]) and, specifically, obstetric (aPR, 1.3 [95% CI, 1.2-1.4]) and cardiac conditions (aPR, 10.2 [95% CI, 9.1-11.4]), stillbirth (aPR, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.1-2.4]), and preterm delivery (aPR, 1.6 [95% CI, 1.4-1.8]). More women with severe CHD, compared with nonsevere, experienced adverse conditions overall (aPR, 1.5 [95% CI, 1.2-1.9]). Conclusions Women with CHD have elevated prevalence of adverse cardiac and obstetric conditions during pregnancy; 4 in 100 used potentially teratogenic or fetotoxic medications, and only half received an American Heart Association-recommended comprehensive echocardiogram.

Indexed as

Insurance, HealthPrivate SectorAdolescentAdultCardiovascular AgentsDatabases, FactualDrug PrescriptionsEchocardiographyFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomePrevalenceRetrospective StudiesCardiovascular Agentsadultcardiologyheart defects, congenitalpregnancypregnancy complicationspregnancy outcomes

Identifiers

PMID32506927
PMCPMC7372719
OpenAlexW3034161273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.